United States

Large-scale deflagration and detonation experiments of hydrogen and air mixtures provide fundamental data needed to address accident scenarios and to help in the evaluation and validation of numerical models. Several different experiments of this type were performed. Measurements included flame front time of arrival (TOA) using ionization probes blast pressure heat flux high-speed video standard video and infrared video. The large-scale open-space tests used a hemispherical 300-m3 facility that confined the mixture within a thin plastic tent that was cut prior to initiating a deflagration. Initial homogeneous hydrogen concentrations varied from 15% to 30%. An array of large cylindrical obstacles was placed within the mixture for some experiments to explore turbulent enhancement of the combustion. All tests were ignited at the bottom center of the facility using either a spark or in one case a small quantity of high explosive to generate a detonation. Spark-initiated deflagration tests were performed within the tunnel using homogeneous hydrogen mixtures. Several experiments were performed in which 0.1 kg and 2.2 kg of hydrogen were released into the tunnel with and without ventilation. For some tunnel tests obstacles representing vehicles were used to investigate turbulent enhancement. A test was performed to investigate any enhancement of the deflagration due to partial confinement produced by a narrow gap between aluminium plates. The attenuation of a blast wave was investigated using a 4-m-tall protective blast wall. Finally a large-scale hydrogen jet experiment was performed in which 27 kg of hydrogen was released vertically into the open atmosphere in a period of about 30 seconds. The hydrogen plume spontaneously ignited early in the release.

A simple approximate method for evaluation of blast effects and safety distances for unconfined hydrogen explosions is presented. The method includes models for flame speeds hydrogen distribution blast parameters and blast damage criteria. An example of the application of this methodology for hydrogen releases in three hypothetical obstructed areas with different levels of congestion is presented. The severity of the blast effect of unconfined hydrogen explosions is shown to depend strongly on the level of congestion for relatively small releases. Extremely large releases of hydrogen are predicted to be less sensitive to the congestion level.

The University of Missouri-Rolla (UMR) through a hydrogen internal combustion engine vehicle evaluation participation agreement with the Ford Motor Company will establish a commuter bus service and hydrogen refueling at a station in rural Missouri near Ft. Leonard Wood (FLW). Initiated by a request from the U.S. Army Maneuver Support Center at FLW UMR is leading the effort to launch the commuter service between FLW and the neighboring towns of Rolla and Lebanon Missouri each of which are located approximately 40 km from the military base on Interstate-44 highway. The broad research training and education agenda for the rural hydrogen transportation test bed is to develop demonstrate evaluate and promote safe hydrogen-based technologies in a real world environment. With funds provided by the Defense Logistics Agency through the Air Force Research Laboratory this hydrogen initiative will build and operate a hydrogen fueling facility that includes on-site generation of hydrogen through electrolysis as well as selling a range of other traditional and alternative fuels.

The FLACS CFD-tool for consequence prediction has been developed continuously since 1980. The initial focus was explosion safety on offshore oil platforms in recent years the tool is also applied to study dispersion hydrogen safety dust explosions and more. A development project sponsored by Norsk Hydro Statoil and Ishikawajima Heavy Industries (IHI) was carried out to improve the modelling and validation of hydrogen dispersion and explosions. In this project GexCon carried out 200 small-scale experiments on dispersion and explosion with H₂ and mixtures with H₂ and CO or N₂. Experiments with varying confinement congestion concentration and ignition location were performed. Since the main purpose of the tests was to produce good validation data all tests were simulated with the FLACS-HYDROGEN tool. The simulations confirmed the ability to predict explosions effects for the wide range of scenarios studied. A few examples of comparisons will be shown. To build confidence in a consequence prediction model it is important that the scales used for validation are as close as possible to reality. Since the hazard to people and facilities and the risk will generally increase with scale validation against large-scale experiments is important. In the 1980s a series of large-scale explosion experiments with H2 was carried out in the Sandia FLAME facility and sponsored by the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission. The FLAME facility is a 30.5m x 1.83m x 2.44m channel tests were performed with H2 concentrations from 7% to 30% with varying degree of top venting (0% 13% and 50%) and congestion (with or without baffles blocking 33% of the channel cross-section). A wide range of flame speeds and overpressures were observed. Comparisons are made between FLACS simulations and FLAME tests. The main conclusion from this validation study is that the precision when predicting H2 explosion consequences with FLACS has been improved to a very acceptable level

A combined experimental and modeling program is being carried out at Sandia National Laboratories to characterize and predict the behavior of unintended hydrogen releases. In the case where the hydrogen leak remains unignited knowledge of the concentration field and flammability envelope is an issue of importance in determining consequence distances for the safe use of hydrogen. In the case where a high-pressure leak of hydrogen is ignited a classic turbulent jet flame forms. Knowledge of the flame length and thermal radiation heat flux distribution is important to safety. Depending on the effective diameter of the leak and the tank source pressure free jet flames can be extensive in length and pose significant radiation and impingement hazard resulting in consequence distances that are unacceptably large. One possible mitigation strategy to potentially reduce the exposure to jet flames is to incorporate barriers around hydrogen storage equipment. The reasoning is that walls will reduce the extent of unacceptable consequences due to jet releases resulting from accidents involving high-pressure equipment. While reducing the jet extent the walls may introduce other hazards if not configured properly. The goal of this work is to provide guidance on configuration and placement of these walls to minimize overall hazards using a quantitative risk assessment approach. Detailed Navier-Stokes calculations of jet flames and unignited jets are used to understand how hydrogen leaks and jet-flames interact with barriers. The effort is complemented by an experimental program that considers the interaction of jet flames and unignited jets with barriers.

Hydrogen is seen as the future automobile energy storage media due to its inherent cleanliness upon oxidation and its ready utilization in fuel cell applications. Its physical storage in light weight low volume systems is a key technical requirement. In searching for ever higher gravimetric and volumetric density hydrogen storage materials and systems it is inevitable that higher energy density materials will be studied and used. To make safe and commercially acceptable systems it is important to understand quantitatively the risks involved in using and handling these materials and to develop appropriate risk mitigation strategies to handle unforeseen accidental events. To evaluate these materials and systems an IPHE sanctioned program was initiated in 2006 partnering laboratories from Europe North America and Japan. The objective of this international program is to understanding the physical risks involved in synthesis handling and utilization of solid state hydrogen storage materials and to develop methods to mitigate these risks. This understanding will support ultimate acceptance of commercially high density hydrogen storage system designs. An overview of the approaches to be taken to achieve this objective will be given. Initial experimental results will be presented on environmental exposure of NaAlH4 a candidate high density hydrogen storage compound. The tests to be shown are based on United Nations recommendations for the transport of hazardous materials and include air and water exposure of the hydride at three hydrogen charge levels in various physical configurations. Additional tests developed by the American Society for Testing and Materials were used to quantify the dust cloud ignition characteristics of this material which may result from accidental high energy impacts and system breach. Results of these tests are shown along with necessary risk mitigation techniques used in the synthesis and fabrication of a prototype hydrogen storage system.

In close cooperation with their Canadian counterparts United States public safety authorities are taking the first steps towards creating a proper infrastructure to ensure the safe use of the new hydrogen fuel cells now being introduced commercially. Currently public safety officials are being asked to permit hydrogen fuel cells for stationary power and as emergency power backups for the telecommunications towers that exist everywhere. Consistent application of the safety codes is difficult – in part because it is new – yet it is far more complex to train emergency responders to deal safely with the inevitable hydrogen incidents. The US and Canadian building and fire codes and standards are similar but not identical. The US and Canadian rules are unlikely to be useful to other nations without modification to suit different regulatory systems. However emergency responder safety training is potentially more universal. The risks strategies and tactics are unlikely to differ much by region. The Hydrogen Executive Leadership Panel (HELP) made emergency responder safety training its first priority because the transition to hydrogen depends on keeping incidents small and inoffensive and the public and responders safe from harm. One might think that advising 1.2 million firefighters and 800000 law enforcement officers about hydrogen risks is no more complicated than adding guidance to a website. One would be wrong. The term “training” has specific legal implications which may vary by state. For hazardous materials federal requirements apply. Insurance companies place training requirements on the policies they sell to fire departments including the thousands of small all-volunteer departments which may operate as private corporations. Union contracts may define training and promotions may be based on satisfactorily completed certain levels of training. Emergency responders could no sooner learn how to extinguish a<br/>hydrogen fire by reading a webpage than a person could learn to ride a bicycle by reading a book. Procedures must be learned by listening reading and then doing. Regular practice is necessary. As new hydrogen applications are commercialized additional responder training may be necessary. This highlights another obstacle emergency responders’ ability to travel distances and take the time to undergo training. Historically fire academies established adjunct instructor programs and satellite academies to bring the training to firefighters. The large well-equipped academies are typically used for specialized training. States rarely have enough instructors and instructors often must take the time to create a course outline research each point and produce a program that is informative useful and holds the attention of responders. The challenge of training emergency responders seems next to impossible but public safety authorities are asked to tackle the impossible every day and a model exists to move forward in the U.S. Over the past few years the National Association of State Fire Marshals and U.S. Department of Transportation enlisted the help of emergency responders and industry to create a standardized approach to train emergency responders to deal with pipeline incidents. A curriculum and training materials were created and more than 26000 sets have been distributed for free to public safety agencies nationwide. More than 8000 instructors have been trained to use these materials that are now part of the regular training in 23 states. Using this model HELP intends to ensure that all emergency responders are trained to address hydrogen risks. The model and the rigorous scenario analysis and review used to developing the operational and technical training is addressed in this paper.

The permitting process for hydrogen fueling stations varies from country to country. However a common step in the permitting process is the demonstration that the proposed fueling station meets certain safety requirements. Currently many permitting authorities rely on compliance with well known codes and standards as a means to permit a facility. Current codes and standards for hydrogen facilities require certain safety features specify equipment made of material suitable for hydrogen environment and include separation or safety distances. Thus compliance with the code and standard requirements is widely accepted as evidence of a safe design. However to ensure that a hydrogen facility is indeed safe the code and standard requirements should be identified using a risk-informed process that utilizes an acceptable level of risk. When compliance with one or more code or standard requirements is not possible an evaluation of the risk associated with the exemptions to the requirements should be understood and conveyed to the Authority Having Jurisdiction (AHJ). Establishment of a consistent risk assessment toolset and associated data is essential to performing these risk evaluations. This paper describes an approach for risk-informing the permitting process for hydrogen fueling stations that relies primarily on the establishment of risk-informed codes and standards. The proposed risk-informed process begins with the establishment of acceptable risk criteria associated with the operation of hydrogen fueling stations. Using accepted Quantitative Risk Assessment (QRA) techniques and the established risk criteria the minimum code and standard requirements necessary to ensure the safe operation of hydrogen facilities can be identified. Risk informed permitting processes exist in some countries and are being developed in others. To facilitate consistent risk-informed approaches the participants in the International Energy Agency (IEA) Task 19 on hydrogen safety are working to identify acceptable risk criteria QRA models and supporting data.

Demonstrated safety in the production distribution and use of hydrogen will be critical to successful implementation of a hydrogen infrastructure. Recognizing the importance of this issue the U.S. Department of Energy has established the Hydrogen Safety Program to ensure safe operations of its hydrogen research and development program as well as to identify and address needs for new knowledge and technologies in the future hydrogen economy. Activities in the Safety Program range across the entire safety spectrum including: R&D devoted to investigation of hydrogen behaviour physical characteristics materials compatibility and risk analysis; inspection and investigation into the safety procedures and practices of all hydrogen projects supported by DOE funds; development of critical technologies for safe hydrogen systems such as sensors and design techniques; and safety training and education for emergency responders code inspectors and the general public. Throughout its activities the Safety Program encourages the open sharing of information to enable widespread benefit from any lessons learned or new information developed.



This paper provides detailed descriptions of the various activities of the DOE Hydrogen Safety Program and includes some example impacts already achieved from its implementation.

Hydrogen production is critical to many modern chemical processes – ammonia synthesis petroleum refining direct reduction of iron and more. Conventional approaches to hydrogen manufacture include steam methane reforming and autothermal reforming which today account for the lion's share of hydrogen generation. Without CO₂ capture these processes emit about 8.7 kg of CO₂ for each kg of H₂ produced. In this study a molten carbonate fuel cell system with CO₂ capture is proposed to retrofit the flue gas stream of an existing Steam Methane Reforming plant rated at 100000 Nm3 h−1 of 99.5% pure H2. The thermodynamic analysis shows direct CO₂ emissions can be reduced by more than 95% to 0.4 to 0.5 kg CO₂ /kg H₂ while producing 17% more hydrogen (with an increase in natural gas input of approximately 37%). Because of the additional power and hydrogen generation of the carbonate fuel cell the efficiency debit associated with CO₂ capture is quite small reducing the SMR efficiency from 76.6% without capture to 75.6% with capture. In comparison the use of standard amine technology for CO2 capture reduces the efficiency below 70%. This demonstrates the synergistic nature of the carbonate fuel cells which can reform natural gas to H₂ while simultaneously capturing CO₂ from the SMR flue gas and producing electricity giving rise to a total system with very low emissions yet high efficiency.