Transmission, Distribution & Storage
Numerical Study of Liquid Hydrogen Internal Flow in Liquid Hydrogen Storage Tank
Oct 2025
Publication
As a key zero-carbon energy carrier the accurate measurement of liquid hydrogen flow in its industrial chain is crucial. However the ultra-low temperature ultra-low density and other properties of liquid hydrogen can introduce calibration errors. To enhance the measurement accuracy and reliability of liquid hydrogen flow this study investigates the heat and mass transfer within a 1 m3 non-vented storage tank during the calibration process of a liquid hydrogen flow standard device that integrates combined dynamic and static gravimetric methods. The vertical tank configuration was selected to minimize the vapor–liquid interface area thereby suppressing boil-off gas generation and enhancing pressure stability which is critical for measurement accuracy. Building upon research on cryogenic flow standard devices as well as tank experiments and simulations this study employs computational fluid dynamics (CFD) with Fluent 2024 software to numerically simulate liquid hydrogen flow within a non-vented tank. The thermophysical properties of hydrogen crucial for the accuracy of the phase-change simulation were implemented using high-fidelity real-fluid data from the NIST Standard Reference Database as the ideal gas law is invalid under the cryogenic conditions studied. Specifically the Lee model was enhanced via User-Defined Functions (UDFs) to accurately simulate the key phasechange processes involving coupled flash evaporation and condensation during liquid hydrogen refueling. The simulation results demonstrated good agreement with NASA experimental data. This study systematically examined the effects of key parameters including inlet flow conditions and inlet liquid temperature on the flow characteristics of liquid hydrogen entering the tank and the subsequent heat and mass transfer behavior within the tank. The results indicated that an increase in mass flow rate elevates tank pressure and reduces filling time. Conversely a decrease in the inlet liquid hydrogen temperature significantly intensifies heat and mass transfer during the initial refueling stage. These findings provide important theoretical support for a deeper understanding of the complex physical mechanisms of liquid hydrogen flow calibration in non-vented tanks and for optimizing calibration accuracy.
Enhancing Regional Integrated Energy Systems Through Seasonal Hydrogen Storage: Insights from a Stackelberg Game Model
Nov 2025
Publication
This study enhances regional integrated energy systems by proposing a Stackelberg planning–operation model with seasonal hydrogen storage addressing source–network separation. An equilibrium algorithm is developed that integrates a competitive search routine with mixed-integer optimization. In the price–energy game framework the hydrogen storage operator is designated as the leader while energy producers load aggregators and storage providers act as followers facilitating a distributed collaborative optimization strategy within the Stackelberg game. Using an industrial park in northern China as a case study the findings reveal that the operator’s initiative results in a revenue increase of 38.60% while producer profits rise by 6.10% and storage-provider profits surge by 108.75%. Additionally renewable accommodation reaches 93.86% reflecting an absolute improvement of 20.60 percentage points. Total net energy imbalance decreases by 55.70% and heat-loss load is reduced by 31.74%. Overall the proposed approach effectively achieves cross-seasonal energy balancing and multi-party gains providing an engineering-oriented reference for addressing energy imbalances in regional integrated energy systems.
Application of Machine Learning and Data Augmentation Algorithms in the Discovery of Metal Hydrides for Hydrogen Storage
Nov 2025
Publication
The development of efficient and sustainable hydrogen storage materials is a key challenge for realizing hydrogen as a clean and flexible energy carrier. Among various options metal hydrides offer high volumetric storage density and operational safety yet their application is limited by thermodynamic kinetic and compositional constraints. In this work we investigate the potential of machine learning (ML) to predict key thermodynamic properties—equilibrium plateau pressure enthalpy and entropy of hydride formation—based solely on alloy composition using Magpie-generated descriptors. We significantly expand an existing experimental dataset from ~400 to 806 entries and assess the impact of dataset size and data augmentation using the PADRE algorithm on model performance. Models including Support Vector Machines and Gradient Boosted Random Forests were trained and optimized via grid search and cross-validation. Results show a marked improvement in predictive accuracy with increased dataset size while data augmentation benefits are limited to smaller datasets and do not improve accuracy in underrepresented pressure regimes. Furthermore clustering and cross-validation analyses highlight the limited generalizability of models across different material classes though high accuracy is achieved when training and testing within a single hydride family (e.g. AB2). The study demonstrates the viability and limitations of ML for accelerating hydride discovery emphasizing the importance of dataset diversity and representation for robust property prediction.
A CFD Comparison of Interfacial Phase Change Models for Boil-off, Self-pressurisation and Thermal Stratification in Liquid Hydrogen Storage Tanks
Nov 2025
Publication
Liquid hydrogen (LH2 ) is a promising energy carrier for future clean fuel technologies. However its cryogenic storage and handling pose significant challenges particularly due to self-pressurisation and boil-off from ambient heat ingress. Accurate modelling of these phenomena is essential for the safe and efficient design of LH2 storage systems. A key aspect of such modelling is the selection and implementation of an appropriate interfacial phase change model. This study presents a comparative assessment of three widely used phase change models; the Schrage model the Modified Energy Jump (MeJ) model and the Lee model. A parametric study was conducted across three coefficients for each model with validation performed against five experimental benchmark cases from NASA’s K-Site and MHTB cryogenic tanks focusing on planar interface problems with thermally induced phase change under normal gravity. A CFD approach using STAR-CCM+ was employed to evaluate each model’s ability to predict tank pressure temperature and boil-off behaviour. The Schrage model demonstrated the most robust and accurate results exhibiting minimal sensitivity to coefficient variation and offering both numerical stability and physical fidelity. It demonstrated a maximum mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) of just 3.0% in its pressurisation predictions. The MeJ model showed comparable accuracy when its heat transfer coefficient was appropriately selected highlighting its reliance on an empirically derived coefficient. In contrast the Lee model performed the poorest exhibiting numerical divergence at high coefficient values and substantial deviation in its prediction of self-pressurisation with errors of up to 11% MAPE. These findings provide practical guidance for the selection and implementation of phase change models in CFD simulations and highlight key considerations for modelling LH2 storage tanks in industrial applications.
Thermal and Heat Transfer Dynamics in High Pressure, High Aspect Ratio Hydrogen Tank Filling Processes
Nov 2025
Publication
A thermodynamic modeling framework is introduced to describe hydrogen refueling station configurations and capture detailed thermal dynamics in vehicle tanks with large aspect ratios. With an aspect ratio larger than three axial discretization of temperature allows to recover accurate temperature profiles and show that the gas and liner temperature are always highest towards the rear of the tanks. The framework is validated against experimental data and used to investigate the internal heat transfer dynamics. As aspect ratio grows larger the amount of cooling received by the rear region decreases as the incoming turbulent jet does not reach the latter. The current thermal management strategy of pre-cooling is therefore limited showing marginal improvements even with a cooling temperature of -50 ◦C. Potential solutions are to increase the filling duration time or to carefully design the tank with higher thermal diffusivity and adequate external means of cooling.
261 HyPurge - Direct Purging of Networks to Hydrogen for H100 Fife, Final Report
Mar 2026
Publication
Steer Energy and
SGN
The HyPurge project aimed to explore the comparative challenges in purging gas network pipes to hydrogen compared to purging to Natural Gas. A comparative study has been carried out investigating the purging performance of hydrogen and methane on pipe diameters across the range of sizes to be used by SGN in the H100 Fife project.
The most significant discovery of the project is that the very low density of hydrogen does not make direct purging between air and hydrogen impossible or even difficult. In many cases direct purging a system in like for like conditions is more efficient for hydrogen than for methane. At the time of writing it is believed that this is due to the higher coefficient of diffusion for hydrogen.
These findings should provide SGN with confidence that direct purging is a viable option for commissioning and decommissioning the networks for H100 Fife.
Over 750 direct purges or purge related tests have been carried out during this project. The results provide evidence to fill the knowledge gap regarding direct purging performance between air and hydrogen.
Key messages from this work are: 1) Hydrogen purges are generally more efficient than Natural Gas purges. The total volume of air-fuel mixture created in a purge involving hydrogen is likely to be less than one involving Natural Gas.
In tests purges from air to hydrogen have been consistently more efficient than purges from air to methane. Purges from both fuel gases back to air have a relatively similar performance to each other. The low density of hydrogen did not present any challenges for direct purging operations. This means that less fuel-air mix and less fuel in total is released for a hydrogen purge compared to a Natural Gas purge. 2) Hydrogen purges are generally more flammable than Natural Gas purges. The flammable volume of air-fuel mixtures created inside the pipe during a purge involving hydrogen is likely to be greater than one involving Natural Gas.
Although less air-fuel mixture is created during a hydrogen purge the wider flammable range of hydrogen means that the volume of mixture that is flammable inside the pipe is greater for a hydrogen purge than for a Natural Gas purge. 3) The total volume of flammable air-fuel mixtures generated outside of the pipe during a purge involving hydrogen is likely to be less than one involving Natural Gas. The upper flammable limit does not prevent vented fuel becoming flammable once it mixes with air outside of the pipe.
This report was submitted to HSE for their assessment of the safety evidence for 100% hydrogen heating which can be found at Hydrogen heating: HSE assessment of the safety evidence - GOV.UK.
Queries should be directed to DESNZ: https://www.gov.uk/guidance/contact-desnz.
The most significant discovery of the project is that the very low density of hydrogen does not make direct purging between air and hydrogen impossible or even difficult. In many cases direct purging a system in like for like conditions is more efficient for hydrogen than for methane. At the time of writing it is believed that this is due to the higher coefficient of diffusion for hydrogen.
These findings should provide SGN with confidence that direct purging is a viable option for commissioning and decommissioning the networks for H100 Fife.
Over 750 direct purges or purge related tests have been carried out during this project. The results provide evidence to fill the knowledge gap regarding direct purging performance between air and hydrogen.
Key messages from this work are: 1) Hydrogen purges are generally more efficient than Natural Gas purges. The total volume of air-fuel mixture created in a purge involving hydrogen is likely to be less than one involving Natural Gas.
In tests purges from air to hydrogen have been consistently more efficient than purges from air to methane. Purges from both fuel gases back to air have a relatively similar performance to each other. The low density of hydrogen did not present any challenges for direct purging operations. This means that less fuel-air mix and less fuel in total is released for a hydrogen purge compared to a Natural Gas purge. 2) Hydrogen purges are generally more flammable than Natural Gas purges. The flammable volume of air-fuel mixtures created inside the pipe during a purge involving hydrogen is likely to be greater than one involving Natural Gas.
Although less air-fuel mixture is created during a hydrogen purge the wider flammable range of hydrogen means that the volume of mixture that is flammable inside the pipe is greater for a hydrogen purge than for a Natural Gas purge. 3) The total volume of flammable air-fuel mixtures generated outside of the pipe during a purge involving hydrogen is likely to be less than one involving Natural Gas. The upper flammable limit does not prevent vented fuel becoming flammable once it mixes with air outside of the pipe.
This report was submitted to HSE for their assessment of the safety evidence for 100% hydrogen heating which can be found at Hydrogen heating: HSE assessment of the safety evidence - GOV.UK.
Queries should be directed to DESNZ: https://www.gov.uk/guidance/contact-desnz.
301 HyPurge Safe Tooling, Final Report
Mar 2026
Publication
SGN and
Steer Energy
This project has investigated equipment used to carry out purging of gas networks with a view to providing tooling for commissioning SGN’s H100 Fife project.
It has built on work including the HyPurge NIA2_SGN0008 and Lot 1 of the Hydrogen Skills and Standards for Heat projects. The project has further advanced the body of purge theory founded and developed in those previous projects. The HyPurge project showed that direct purging was feasible with hydrogen; this project has investigated some of the hazards presented and recommended tooling to mitigate those hazards.
Flame arrestors are specified for certain network operations involving Natural Gas. It is recommended that the current procedures regarding flame arrestors are kept for hydrogen and a range of flame arrestors suited to hydrogen use has been identified.
Purge tables specify minimum speeds for purging related to pipe diameter. These minimum purge speeds are used to suppress the buoyancy driven effect of a less dense gas to preferentially flow over a denser gas. The lower buoyancy of hydrogen suggests an increase in purge speed of 1.7x those recommended for methane. This increase is not required in smaller diameters (100 mm and below) where it has been found that diffusion effects dominate purge performance resulting in greater flexibility for purging. Therefore purge tables have been produced giving recommended minimum purge speeds for methane and hydrogen according to the PE pipe diameters proposed in the H100 Fife project.
A purge stack with additional features to assist with hydrogen purging has been developed in this project. The features include a restriction at the end of the stack to mitigate burn-back in the event of a vent ignition. Specific restriction sizes are linked to the diameter of network pipes being purged and each individual restriction is tailored to achieve the correct purge speed for the given network pipe diameter. A pressure gauge on the stack indicates sufficient back pressure showing the correct purge flow is being achieved. The stack also includes a hydrogen wHystle (developed by Steer independently) to provide feedback on purge progress in real time.
A review of non-sparking tool requirements has been carried out. Purge operations are such that it is unlikely that non-sparking tools will provide a significant reduction in hazard. The conclusions from this are that the current recommendations from SGN’s mainlay procedures on non-sparking tools and ignition prevention will be suitable for hydrogen use.
A preliminary investigation into the consequences of in-pipe ignitions has been carried out. The investigation has shown that the overpressures generated are affected by several different factors. The proportion of the pipe that contains the flammable mixture affects the ability of the system to absorb the overpressure through non-flammable gas buffer zones. Once detonable zones increase in size then the absolute length of the detonable zone in relation to pipe diameter becomes a dominant factor. The most significant hazard to be prevented is an in-pipe detonation therefore the volume of detonable mixture is an important factor that may result in a limit to the permitted length for direct purging in a given pipe diameter.
The hazards presented during purging have been investigated and three specific hazards have been studied. These are ignition of the vent in-pipe ignition and burn back from a vent ignition into the pipe. Although none of these events are likely to occur ignition of the vent is the most likely and the consequence of this is similar with hydrogen and methane. In-pipe ignition is the event with the greatest consequence and although very unlikely this should be avoided.
Proposed further work includes: data mining from the body of purge studies to date identification of the growth of flammable and detonable zones vs. purge length a study into static electricity generation and consequence testing on ignitions in a variety of 90 mm and 125 mm PE pipes of different lengths.
This report was submitted to HSE for their assessment of the safety evidence for 100% hydrogen heating which can be found at Hydrogen heating: HSE assessment of the safety evidence - GOV.UK.
Queries should be directed to DESNZ: https://www.gov.uk/guidance/contact-desnz
It has built on work including the HyPurge NIA2_SGN0008 and Lot 1 of the Hydrogen Skills and Standards for Heat projects. The project has further advanced the body of purge theory founded and developed in those previous projects. The HyPurge project showed that direct purging was feasible with hydrogen; this project has investigated some of the hazards presented and recommended tooling to mitigate those hazards.
Flame arrestors are specified for certain network operations involving Natural Gas. It is recommended that the current procedures regarding flame arrestors are kept for hydrogen and a range of flame arrestors suited to hydrogen use has been identified.
Purge tables specify minimum speeds for purging related to pipe diameter. These minimum purge speeds are used to suppress the buoyancy driven effect of a less dense gas to preferentially flow over a denser gas. The lower buoyancy of hydrogen suggests an increase in purge speed of 1.7x those recommended for methane. This increase is not required in smaller diameters (100 mm and below) where it has been found that diffusion effects dominate purge performance resulting in greater flexibility for purging. Therefore purge tables have been produced giving recommended minimum purge speeds for methane and hydrogen according to the PE pipe diameters proposed in the H100 Fife project.
A purge stack with additional features to assist with hydrogen purging has been developed in this project. The features include a restriction at the end of the stack to mitigate burn-back in the event of a vent ignition. Specific restriction sizes are linked to the diameter of network pipes being purged and each individual restriction is tailored to achieve the correct purge speed for the given network pipe diameter. A pressure gauge on the stack indicates sufficient back pressure showing the correct purge flow is being achieved. The stack also includes a hydrogen wHystle (developed by Steer independently) to provide feedback on purge progress in real time.
A review of non-sparking tool requirements has been carried out. Purge operations are such that it is unlikely that non-sparking tools will provide a significant reduction in hazard. The conclusions from this are that the current recommendations from SGN’s mainlay procedures on non-sparking tools and ignition prevention will be suitable for hydrogen use.
A preliminary investigation into the consequences of in-pipe ignitions has been carried out. The investigation has shown that the overpressures generated are affected by several different factors. The proportion of the pipe that contains the flammable mixture affects the ability of the system to absorb the overpressure through non-flammable gas buffer zones. Once detonable zones increase in size then the absolute length of the detonable zone in relation to pipe diameter becomes a dominant factor. The most significant hazard to be prevented is an in-pipe detonation therefore the volume of detonable mixture is an important factor that may result in a limit to the permitted length for direct purging in a given pipe diameter.
The hazards presented during purging have been investigated and three specific hazards have been studied. These are ignition of the vent in-pipe ignition and burn back from a vent ignition into the pipe. Although none of these events are likely to occur ignition of the vent is the most likely and the consequence of this is similar with hydrogen and methane. In-pipe ignition is the event with the greatest consequence and although very unlikely this should be avoided.
Proposed further work includes: data mining from the body of purge studies to date identification of the growth of flammable and detonable zones vs. purge length a study into static electricity generation and consequence testing on ignitions in a variety of 90 mm and 125 mm PE pipes of different lengths.
This report was submitted to HSE for their assessment of the safety evidence for 100% hydrogen heating which can be found at Hydrogen heating: HSE assessment of the safety evidence - GOV.UK.
Queries should be directed to DESNZ: https://www.gov.uk/guidance/contact-desnz
SIF Beta Phase: Velocity Design with Hydrogen, WP2 - Particle Transportation Tests and CFD Modelling Results, Interim Report
Mar 2026
Publication
This study conducted theoretical modelling and experimental work to investigate if there were differences in particle transportation behaviour in hydrogen compared to natural gas. It was found that both experimental data and predictions indicate that the majority of particles are currently mobile at the standard maximum natural gas velocity of 20m/s thus an increase in velocity to 70m/s with hydrogen should not result in an increase in particle transportation. The experimental observations are that natural gas can transport particles at lower velocities than hydrogen and this is thought to be due to the higher density of natural gas. The consequence is that at a velocity of 20m/s natural gas would transport all mobile particles as would hydrogen at higher velocities and this means that high velocity hydrogen cannot transport more particles already transported by natural gas.
Therefore this study indicates that the mitigations for example filtration requirements and engineering policies and procedures should be unaffected by changing to hydrogen as no change to particle loading is anticipated.
CONCLUSIONS
• Modelling has been undertaken to predict particle flight and rolling velocities in 100% hydrogen and 100% natural gas to support experiments.
o Initial comparison between the CFD modelling and British Gas modelling indicates results are similar for both particle rolling and flight velocities for 100% hydrogen at 2barg.
o For 100% methane the British Gas model results are 32-38% lower than those predicted by CFD modelling.
• Initial particle transportation experiments have been conducted using a purpose built test facility at Spadeadam to investigate particle transportation in 100% hydrogen and 100% natural gas at 2barg and 40mbarg.
o Initial experimental results indicate that particle transportation occurred at lower velocities in natural gas than for hydrogen.
o From experimental data rolling and flight of particles occurs over a range of velocities and there is not one specific velocity to instigate rolling or flight.
o Tests were performed for services in hydrogen. However a limited amount of sand was observed to travel up the service compared to the mains.
• Both experimental data and predictions indicate that the majority of particles are currently mobile at the standard maximum natural gas velocity of 20m/s (for unfiltered gas) thus an increase in velocity to 70m/s with hydrogen should not result in an increase in particle transportation.
• This study indicates that the mitigations used for natural gas should still be effective for hydrogen service
This report was submitted to HSE for their assessment of the safety evidence for 100% hydrogen heating which can be found at Hydrogen heating: HSE assessment of the safety evidence - GOV.UK.
Queries should be directed to DESNZ: https://www.gov.uk/guidance/contact-desnz.
Therefore this study indicates that the mitigations for example filtration requirements and engineering policies and procedures should be unaffected by changing to hydrogen as no change to particle loading is anticipated.
CONCLUSIONS
• Modelling has been undertaken to predict particle flight and rolling velocities in 100% hydrogen and 100% natural gas to support experiments.
o Initial comparison between the CFD modelling and British Gas modelling indicates results are similar for both particle rolling and flight velocities for 100% hydrogen at 2barg.
o For 100% methane the British Gas model results are 32-38% lower than those predicted by CFD modelling.
• Initial particle transportation experiments have been conducted using a purpose built test facility at Spadeadam to investigate particle transportation in 100% hydrogen and 100% natural gas at 2barg and 40mbarg.
o Initial experimental results indicate that particle transportation occurred at lower velocities in natural gas than for hydrogen.
o From experimental data rolling and flight of particles occurs over a range of velocities and there is not one specific velocity to instigate rolling or flight.
o Tests were performed for services in hydrogen. However a limited amount of sand was observed to travel up the service compared to the mains.
• Both experimental data and predictions indicate that the majority of particles are currently mobile at the standard maximum natural gas velocity of 20m/s (for unfiltered gas) thus an increase in velocity to 70m/s with hydrogen should not result in an increase in particle transportation.
• This study indicates that the mitigations used for natural gas should still be effective for hydrogen service
This report was submitted to HSE for their assessment of the safety evidence for 100% hydrogen heating which can be found at Hydrogen heating: HSE assessment of the safety evidence - GOV.UK.
Queries should be directed to DESNZ: https://www.gov.uk/guidance/contact-desnz.
MOBs Phase 3: Task 3 - Network Pipeline Capacity
Mar 2026
Publication
There is a requirement for gas distribution network (GDN) operators to understand the cost safety and practicality of converting network pipelines from supplying Natural Gas to Hydrogen in multi-occupancy buildings (MOBs). Previous work undertaken during project ‘MOBs Work Pack 2 Asset Information Review’ identified the following gap in technical evidence relating to network pipeline capacity:
♦ The adequacy of the diameter of existing risers and laterals to supply the energy required with Hydrogen need to be investigated.
♦ The effects of an increased flow rate velocity or increased pressure (pipe integrity) should it be required to meet the demand without increasing the diameter of risers and laterals. This would need to consider the effect of altitude on Hydrogen riser systems the pressure drops from existing fittings and additional safety devices installed (e.g. excess flow valves) and the minimum pressure required to ensure safe operation of Hydrogen appliances.
SGN is leading a feasibility project with some applied testing to understand the steps needed to convert MOBs to Hydrogen. The program is formed through 4 main work packs broken down into 2 main stage gated programmes (Part A = WP1 2 & Part B = WP3 4). This report is part of Work Pack 3 and summarises Task 3. The objective of Task 3 is to address evidence by examining the effects of increased volumetric flowrate velocity and/or increased pressure (pipe integrity) using the OLGA (V2021.2) pipeline simulator.
An earlier report described the survey of eighteen multi-occupancy buildings of various heights ages and construction methods. Of the eighteen multi-occupancy buildings eight were selected for analysis of capacity. A further two buildings representative of standard riser and lateral design were modelled with the data taken from the SGN management procedure SGN/PM/RL/1.
This report was submitted to HSE for their assessment of the safety evidence for 100% hydrogen heating which can be found at Hydrogen heating: HSE assessment of the safety evidence - GOV.UK.
Queries should be directed to DESNZ: https://www.gov.uk/guidance/contact-desnz.
♦ The adequacy of the diameter of existing risers and laterals to supply the energy required with Hydrogen need to be investigated.
♦ The effects of an increased flow rate velocity or increased pressure (pipe integrity) should it be required to meet the demand without increasing the diameter of risers and laterals. This would need to consider the effect of altitude on Hydrogen riser systems the pressure drops from existing fittings and additional safety devices installed (e.g. excess flow valves) and the minimum pressure required to ensure safe operation of Hydrogen appliances.
SGN is leading a feasibility project with some applied testing to understand the steps needed to convert MOBs to Hydrogen. The program is formed through 4 main work packs broken down into 2 main stage gated programmes (Part A = WP1 2 & Part B = WP3 4). This report is part of Work Pack 3 and summarises Task 3. The objective of Task 3 is to address evidence by examining the effects of increased volumetric flowrate velocity and/or increased pressure (pipe integrity) using the OLGA (V2021.2) pipeline simulator.
An earlier report described the survey of eighteen multi-occupancy buildings of various heights ages and construction methods. Of the eighteen multi-occupancy buildings eight were selected for analysis of capacity. A further two buildings representative of standard riser and lateral design were modelled with the data taken from the SGN management procedure SGN/PM/RL/1.
This report was submitted to HSE for their assessment of the safety evidence for 100% hydrogen heating which can be found at Hydrogen heating: HSE assessment of the safety evidence - GOV.UK.
Queries should be directed to DESNZ: https://www.gov.uk/guidance/contact-desnz.
LTS Futures Grangemouth to Granton Pipeline Assessment of TD/1 Compliance
Mar 2026
Publication
SGN are undertaking the LTS Futures Project which forms part of the UK’s national hydrogen research programme to deliver a net zero decarbonisation solution for customers. The project seeks to research develop test and evidence the compatibility of the Great Britain (GB) Local Transmission System (LTS) assets pipelines associated plant and ancillary fittings for hydrogen service.
The aim of the project is to demonstrate that the LTS can be repurposed to convey hydrogen providing options for the decarbonisation of power industry heat and transport by delivering a safe supply of energy to all customers both during and after the energy transition. The LTS Futures project includes a repurposing trial of the Grangemouth to Granton pipeline.
Prior to repurposing to convey hydrogen the Grangemouth to Granton pipeline is to be audited in accordance with the requirements of IGEM/TD/1 Edition 6 clause 12.4.2.1 noting the requirements of Supplement 2 for High Pressure Hydrogen Pipelines [1 2]. This is a formal assessment of the integrity of the pipeline and an assessment of the risk posed on the surrounding population.
This report presents the assessment of TD/1 compliance of the Grangemouth to Granton pipeline.
This report was submitted to HSE for their assessment of the safety evidence for 100% hydrogen heating which can be found at Hydrogen heating: HSE assessment of the safety evidence - GOV.UK.
Queries should be directed to DESNZ: https://www.gov.uk/guidance/contact-desnz.
The aim of the project is to demonstrate that the LTS can be repurposed to convey hydrogen providing options for the decarbonisation of power industry heat and transport by delivering a safe supply of energy to all customers both during and after the energy transition. The LTS Futures project includes a repurposing trial of the Grangemouth to Granton pipeline.
Prior to repurposing to convey hydrogen the Grangemouth to Granton pipeline is to be audited in accordance with the requirements of IGEM/TD/1 Edition 6 clause 12.4.2.1 noting the requirements of Supplement 2 for High Pressure Hydrogen Pipelines [1 2]. This is a formal assessment of the integrity of the pipeline and an assessment of the risk posed on the surrounding population.
This report presents the assessment of TD/1 compliance of the Grangemouth to Granton pipeline.
This report was submitted to HSE for their assessment of the safety evidence for 100% hydrogen heating which can be found at Hydrogen heating: HSE assessment of the safety evidence - GOV.UK.
Queries should be directed to DESNZ: https://www.gov.uk/guidance/contact-desnz.
LTS Futures Technical Report No. 2: Charpy Impact Testing & Transverse Strip Tensile Testin
Mar 2026
Publication
This report covers the Charpy impact testing and the transverse strip (flat) tensile testing of SGN pipes. The testing has been conducted on specimens extracted from three types of X52 steel grade linepipe: (a) Pipe A seemless; (b) Pipe B spiral seam welded; (c) Pipe C longitudinal seam welded.
This report was submitted to HSE for their assessment of the safety evidence for 100% hydrogen heating which can be found at Hydrogen heating: HSE assessment of the safety evidence - GOV.UK.
Queries should be directed to DESNZ: https://www.gov.uk/guidance/contact-desnz.
This report was submitted to HSE for their assessment of the safety evidence for 100% hydrogen heating which can be found at Hydrogen heating: HSE assessment of the safety evidence - GOV.UK.
Queries should be directed to DESNZ: https://www.gov.uk/guidance/contact-desnz.
SIF Alpha Phase - Velocity Design with Hydrogen, Summary Report
Mar 2026
Publication
The current UK natural gas networks operated by the Gas Distribution Networks have the potential to flow blended hydrogen and to be re-purposed to flow 100% hydrogen. The hydrogen networks would therefore have the potential to contribute to Ofgem’s strategic innovation fund (SIF) decarbonisation of heat challenge to help meet national 2030 and 2050 emissions targets.
To demonstrate how the current gas networks can be intelligently and efficiently transitioned to provide low carbon heating the gas velocity constraints for hydrogen applied at the design stage need to be identified. These constraints will directly impact the level of capital investment required in the transition of the system to accommodate blended and 100% hydrogen.
However hydrogen gas does not contain the same level of energy by volume as natural gas so the volume of hydrogen flowing to consumers would have to increase a little over 3 times for an 100% hydrogen network to deliver energy at an equivalent rate compared to natural gas. Without network reinforcement this increase in flow could require a significant increase to the pressure and/or velocity of gas.
Currently IGEM standards specify a nominal maximum velocity of 20 m/s mainly to avoid the risk of debris within the pipes being picked up by the gas stream and causing wear to pipe components possibly then resulting in early failure. A velocity limit of 40 m/s is assumed where the pipe assets are assumed to be clean.
Debris may be present in the system particularly in the lower pressure tiers in the form of dust mainly as a product of the historic manufacture of towns gas. Whilst many metallic mains particularly in the LP pressure tier have been replaced with PE (polyethylene) piping under the ongoing replacement scheme it is anticipated that debris will still be present in the pipes that have not been replaced and may have already been transported into the plastic pipes. Hydrogen has different properties to natural gas so it is not known if debris may be picked up to the same degree or if any other factor will limit velocity. Other factors such as noise and/or vibration may also constrain the design velocity of gas in the system.
Building on this initial work it was envisaged that validation of the pipe network behaviour would require full scale testing to investigate the erosion vibration and noise behaviour associated with transportation of hydrogen and hydrogen blends with natural gas to support the objective of validating and enhancing existing models. To develop the requirements for such testing the “Alpha phase” (this phase) of the SIF project was initiated with the intention of delivering conceptual designs of the full-scale test facilities a detailed test programme and to undertake any associated laboratory testing which would be required to support these activities.
This report summarises the SIF alpha phase conclusions and recommendations from work packages 1 to 5:
Work package 1 Conceptual design of test facilities
Work package 2 Detailed test plan
Work package 3 Laboratory testing
Work package 4 Network engagement
Work package 5 Cost-benefit analysis
This report was submitted to HSE for their assessment of the safety evidence for 100% hydrogen heating which can be found at Hydrogen heating: HSE assessment of the safety evidence - GOV.UK.
Queries should be directed to DESNZ: https://www.gov.uk/guidance/contact-desnz.
To demonstrate how the current gas networks can be intelligently and efficiently transitioned to provide low carbon heating the gas velocity constraints for hydrogen applied at the design stage need to be identified. These constraints will directly impact the level of capital investment required in the transition of the system to accommodate blended and 100% hydrogen.
However hydrogen gas does not contain the same level of energy by volume as natural gas so the volume of hydrogen flowing to consumers would have to increase a little over 3 times for an 100% hydrogen network to deliver energy at an equivalent rate compared to natural gas. Without network reinforcement this increase in flow could require a significant increase to the pressure and/or velocity of gas.
Currently IGEM standards specify a nominal maximum velocity of 20 m/s mainly to avoid the risk of debris within the pipes being picked up by the gas stream and causing wear to pipe components possibly then resulting in early failure. A velocity limit of 40 m/s is assumed where the pipe assets are assumed to be clean.
Debris may be present in the system particularly in the lower pressure tiers in the form of dust mainly as a product of the historic manufacture of towns gas. Whilst many metallic mains particularly in the LP pressure tier have been replaced with PE (polyethylene) piping under the ongoing replacement scheme it is anticipated that debris will still be present in the pipes that have not been replaced and may have already been transported into the plastic pipes. Hydrogen has different properties to natural gas so it is not known if debris may be picked up to the same degree or if any other factor will limit velocity. Other factors such as noise and/or vibration may also constrain the design velocity of gas in the system.
Building on this initial work it was envisaged that validation of the pipe network behaviour would require full scale testing to investigate the erosion vibration and noise behaviour associated with transportation of hydrogen and hydrogen blends with natural gas to support the objective of validating and enhancing existing models. To develop the requirements for such testing the “Alpha phase” (this phase) of the SIF project was initiated with the intention of delivering conceptual designs of the full-scale test facilities a detailed test programme and to undertake any associated laboratory testing which would be required to support these activities.
This report summarises the SIF alpha phase conclusions and recommendations from work packages 1 to 5:
Work package 1 Conceptual design of test facilities
Work package 2 Detailed test plan
Work package 3 Laboratory testing
Work package 4 Network engagement
Work package 5 Cost-benefit analysis
This report was submitted to HSE for their assessment of the safety evidence for 100% hydrogen heating which can be found at Hydrogen heating: HSE assessment of the safety evidence - GOV.UK.
Queries should be directed to DESNZ: https://www.gov.uk/guidance/contact-desnz.
H21 Hydrogen Compatibility of Components Phase 2: Final Report
Mar 2026
Publication
Concerns relating to the production of carbon dioxide (CO₂) and its effects on global background temperatures have led to international efforts to reduce CO₂ emissions. A contributor to CO₂ emissions is the burning of natural gas in domestic and commercial fuel supplies. The use of hydrogen is being explored as a potential alternative to natural gas.
As part of the work associated with delivering H21’s 100% hydrogen gas network a requirement to develop a method of assessing the suitability of gas distribution network assets (e.g. pipes valves regulators) for use with hydrogen up to 7 barg was identified. Phase one of the project developed such a methodology which was delivered to the project stakeholders to conduct component level analysis of assets and determine their suitability without further mitigation. The methodology developed in phase 1 of this project under NIA 276 was used to assess a wide range of assets a number of which were considered as being not suitable for use with hydrogen according to the methodology without further mitigation.
The asset assemblies which did not pass the assessment method at the first stage were district governors/regulators service governors underground modules and slam shut valves. The materials that were identified as having high degradation level scores contributing to the overall ‘fail’ result included various carbon steels spring steels cast aluminium certain brasses one polymer and a range of brand-name sealants.
The work described in this report is a re-assessment and update of the various inputs that make up the method a detailed analysis of function and loading of selected failing assets and an evaluation of where new materials testing may permit an update of the materials degradation ratings. Fifty-seven assets failed the initial assessment of which twenty-seven were identified for further evaluation in this project.
This report was submitted to HSE for their assessment of the safety evidence for 100% hydrogen heating which can be found at Hydrogen heating: HSE assessment of the safety evidence - GOV.UK.
Queries should be directed to DESNZ: https://www.gov.uk/guidance/contact-desnz.
As part of the work associated with delivering H21’s 100% hydrogen gas network a requirement to develop a method of assessing the suitability of gas distribution network assets (e.g. pipes valves regulators) for use with hydrogen up to 7 barg was identified. Phase one of the project developed such a methodology which was delivered to the project stakeholders to conduct component level analysis of assets and determine their suitability without further mitigation. The methodology developed in phase 1 of this project under NIA 276 was used to assess a wide range of assets a number of which were considered as being not suitable for use with hydrogen according to the methodology without further mitigation.
The asset assemblies which did not pass the assessment method at the first stage were district governors/regulators service governors underground modules and slam shut valves. The materials that were identified as having high degradation level scores contributing to the overall ‘fail’ result included various carbon steels spring steels cast aluminium certain brasses one polymer and a range of brand-name sealants.
The work described in this report is a re-assessment and update of the various inputs that make up the method a detailed analysis of function and loading of selected failing assets and an evaluation of where new materials testing may permit an update of the materials degradation ratings. Fifty-seven assets failed the initial assessment of which twenty-seven were identified for further evaluation in this project.
This report was submitted to HSE for their assessment of the safety evidence for 100% hydrogen heating which can be found at Hydrogen heating: HSE assessment of the safety evidence - GOV.UK.
Queries should be directed to DESNZ: https://www.gov.uk/guidance/contact-desnz.
Development of a Method for Assessing Material Compatibility and Component Functionality for 0-7 barg Gas Distribution Assets in Hydrogen Service: Summary Report (WP5, D8)
Mar 2026
Publication
Concerns relating to the production of carbon dioxide (CO2) and its effects on global background temperatures have led to international efforts to reduce CO2 emissions. A contributor to CO2 emissions is the burning of natural gas in domestic and commercial fuel supplies. The H21 project endeavours to explore the use of hydrogen gas as an alternative to natural gas.
As part of the work associated with delivering H21’s 100% hydrogen gas network a requirement was identified to develop a method of assessing the suitability of gas distribution network assets (e.g. pipes valves regulators) for use with hydrogen up to 7 barg. This project has developed such a methodology and this report summarises the work conducted and signposts the main deliverables.
The methodology developed for hydrogen suitability is based on a component-level analysis components being the individual items that make up an asset. The methodology structure is shown below where first the risk of the asset failing when operating on natural gas is determined. Next the asset is broken down to the component level and the individual risk of the components failing when operating on 100% hydrogen is determined. If the combination of these two risks is greater than is considered acceptable by the methodology the asset is considered not suitable for use with hydrogen without further mitigation.
The methodology is supported by the following key inputs delivered through the project:
♦ A list of assets on the gas distrbution network.
♦ A database of materials with their suitabiltiy for use with hydrogen quantified.
The method has been demonstrated on eight case studies and the next step will be for the project stakeholders to apply it to the population of network assets the results of which will gauge the networks readiness for hydrogen.
This report was submitted to HSE for their assessment of the safety evidence for 100% hydrogen heating which can be found at Hydrogen heating: HSE assessment of the safety evidence - GOV.UK.
Queries should be directed to DESNZ: https://www.gov.uk/guidance/contact-desnz.
As part of the work associated with delivering H21’s 100% hydrogen gas network a requirement was identified to develop a method of assessing the suitability of gas distribution network assets (e.g. pipes valves regulators) for use with hydrogen up to 7 barg. This project has developed such a methodology and this report summarises the work conducted and signposts the main deliverables.
The methodology developed for hydrogen suitability is based on a component-level analysis components being the individual items that make up an asset. The methodology structure is shown below where first the risk of the asset failing when operating on natural gas is determined. Next the asset is broken down to the component level and the individual risk of the components failing when operating on 100% hydrogen is determined. If the combination of these two risks is greater than is considered acceptable by the methodology the asset is considered not suitable for use with hydrogen without further mitigation.
The methodology is supported by the following key inputs delivered through the project:
♦ A list of assets on the gas distrbution network.
♦ A database of materials with their suitabiltiy for use with hydrogen quantified.
The method has been demonstrated on eight case studies and the next step will be for the project stakeholders to apply it to the population of network assets the results of which will gauge the networks readiness for hydrogen.
This report was submitted to HSE for their assessment of the safety evidence for 100% hydrogen heating which can be found at Hydrogen heating: HSE assessment of the safety evidence - GOV.UK.
Queries should be directed to DESNZ: https://www.gov.uk/guidance/contact-desnz.
Vintage PE Pipes & Hydrogen: H21 Project, Summary Report
Mar 2026
Publication
Building on earlier work that created evidence on the use of contemporary polyethylene pipes for the distribution of hydrogen fuel gases at pressures below 10bar further work has been completed. This second work stream reports on hydrogen testing with materials supplied installed and operated in the United Kingdom since 1969 oftentimes referred as historic or vintage materials. The findings do not raise any new concerns rather they assist in completing a portfolio of evidence validating expectations of subject experts and of theoretical approaches that polyethylene pipe systems are not deleteriously affected by contact with hydrogen at gas distribution pressures. In an earlier study (NIA_SGN0105) used to underpin a safety case for a new hydrogen network in Fife much evidence was created on modern grades of polyethylene pipe but one question remained in relation to a property known as fracture toughness. This has been satisfactorily addressed and is reported here. Furthermore in relation to historic or vintage materials first generation pipes have been extracted from two locations in the United Kingdom and subjected to testing in contact with hydrogen. A particular focus for vintage pipe studies has been those failure modes that real pipes are most likely to experience in wear out phases for example slow crack growth failure linked to point loads offset pipe welds and squeeze off locations. Attention has also been made to the matter of permeation through materials well researched generally but here specific quantification with vintage/aged materials. The main learning outcome of interest is that permeation rates through materials are affected by temperature. As hydrogen networks can have high temperature feeds to the pipe network this is relevant and data is provided to quantify effects with vintage materials.
This report was submitted to HSE for their assessment of the safety evidence for 100% hydrogen heating which can be found at Hydrogen heating: HSE assessment of the safety evidence - GOV.UK.
Queries should be directed to DESNZ: https://www.gov.uk/guidance/contact-desnz.
This report was submitted to HSE for their assessment of the safety evidence for 100% hydrogen heating which can be found at Hydrogen heating: HSE assessment of the safety evidence - GOV.UK.
Queries should be directed to DESNZ: https://www.gov.uk/guidance/contact-desnz.
EUSE Hydrogen Domestic Pipework Conversion – Final Report
Mar 2026
Publication
Greater assurance regarding the integrity of current domestic gas installation pipework is sought to enable its repurposing to hydrogen. This project needs to be viewed in the context of current leaks from natural gas (NG) of sufficient magnitude to create a fire explosion or injury incident. Gas systems do leak and roughly 400000 publicly reportable escapes (PRE’s) are made each year from 24 million connections. This represents a risk per property of about one PRE every 60 years. The overwhelming majority of these leaks are extremely small and probably better described as weeps.
Odorised gas (as distributed through the low-pressure gas network) can be smelt at about 1000ppm gas in air concentration [1] which is about 2.5% of the published lower flammable limit (LFL) of hydrogen (4% gas in air concentration). This roughly equates to a leak of 10 l/h (0.01 m3/h) in a 25 m3 room. The amount of gas from such a leak is small but still large compared to the leak detectable by a standard IGEM/UP/1/B Edition 3 20 mbarg tightness test which can detect a leak greater than about 0.2 l/h (0.0002 m3/h) [2] for a typical natural gas domestic installation.
Spontaneous leaks (rather than weeps) in domestic and small commercial gas systems are extremely rare. The pressure within these systems (nearly always ca. 20 mbarg) is sufficiently low that it does not cause impromptu pipework failure. The pipes used in these systems do not corrode from the inside and even with external corrosion the nature of this effectively results in a small leak (initially a weep) which only grows slowly with time.
During the period from 2016 to 2022 there was an average of 25 domestic gas incidents a year that were attributed to meters meter outlet pipes (effectively the gas carcass) or appliances but of these only about 0.4 to 1.5 injury incidents arose from spontaneous failure of internal pipework. Therefore risk exposure from the internal pipework itself is very much at the lower end of the ‘Broadly Acceptable’ range defined by the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) and so existing controls under natural gas service should be deemed adequate.
Provided appropriate precautions are taken during the conversion of each property from natural gas to hydrogen it is expected that the risk exposure will remain Broadly Acceptable.
This report was submitted to HSE for their assessment of the safety evidence for 100% hydrogen heating which can be found at Hydrogen heating: HSE assessment of the safety evidence - GOV.UK.
Queries should be directed to DESNZ: https://www.gov.uk/guidance/contact-desnz.
Odorised gas (as distributed through the low-pressure gas network) can be smelt at about 1000ppm gas in air concentration [1] which is about 2.5% of the published lower flammable limit (LFL) of hydrogen (4% gas in air concentration). This roughly equates to a leak of 10 l/h (0.01 m3/h) in a 25 m3 room. The amount of gas from such a leak is small but still large compared to the leak detectable by a standard IGEM/UP/1/B Edition 3 20 mbarg tightness test which can detect a leak greater than about 0.2 l/h (0.0002 m3/h) [2] for a typical natural gas domestic installation.
Spontaneous leaks (rather than weeps) in domestic and small commercial gas systems are extremely rare. The pressure within these systems (nearly always ca. 20 mbarg) is sufficiently low that it does not cause impromptu pipework failure. The pipes used in these systems do not corrode from the inside and even with external corrosion the nature of this effectively results in a small leak (initially a weep) which only grows slowly with time.
During the period from 2016 to 2022 there was an average of 25 domestic gas incidents a year that were attributed to meters meter outlet pipes (effectively the gas carcass) or appliances but of these only about 0.4 to 1.5 injury incidents arose from spontaneous failure of internal pipework. Therefore risk exposure from the internal pipework itself is very much at the lower end of the ‘Broadly Acceptable’ range defined by the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) and so existing controls under natural gas service should be deemed adequate.
Provided appropriate precautions are taken during the conversion of each property from natural gas to hydrogen it is expected that the risk exposure will remain Broadly Acceptable.
This report was submitted to HSE for their assessment of the safety evidence for 100% hydrogen heating which can be found at Hydrogen heating: HSE assessment of the safety evidence - GOV.UK.
Queries should be directed to DESNZ: https://www.gov.uk/guidance/contact-desnz.
MOBs Phase 3: Task 7 - Combined Effect of Hydrogen and Thermal Loading on Material Integrity
Mar 2026
Publication
There is a requirement for gas distribution network (GDN) operators to understand the cost safety and practicality of converting network pipelines from Natural Gas to Hydrogen in multi-occupancy buildings (MOBs). SGN is leading a feasibility project with some applied testing to understand the steps needed to convert to Hydrogen. This report is part of Work Pack 3 and summarises Task 7: combined effect of hydrogen and thermal loading on material integrity.
The aim of this task is to fill the following evidence gaps identified in ROSEN report entitled ‘16357-1 Document Landscape Review Report Issue 1-0’:
♦ Validity of current diameter height lateral length and material limitations and permitted jointing methods.
♦ Susceptibility of low strength steel to hydrogen cracking when subjected to stresses resulting from expansion and contraction and effect of hydrogen on likelihood of failure of risers which do not have the required allowance for expansion and contraction.
♦ Applicability of existing thresholds including minimum permitted wall thickness before isolation and corrosion damage categories for pipe designed to operate at stress levels not greater than 40% SMYS with hydrogen.
Finite Element Analysis (FEA) has been performed to assess the performance of existing carbon steel gas riser configurations when subjected to thermal loading to understand the suitability of converting the existing pipework to hydrogen.
This report was submitted to HSE for their assessment of the safety evidence for 100% hydrogen heating which can be found at Hydrogen heating: HSE assessment of the safety evidence - GOV.UK.
Queries should be directed to DESNZ: https://www.gov.uk/guidance/contact-desnz.
The aim of this task is to fill the following evidence gaps identified in ROSEN report entitled ‘16357-1 Document Landscape Review Report Issue 1-0’:
♦ Validity of current diameter height lateral length and material limitations and permitted jointing methods.
♦ Susceptibility of low strength steel to hydrogen cracking when subjected to stresses resulting from expansion and contraction and effect of hydrogen on likelihood of failure of risers which do not have the required allowance for expansion and contraction.
♦ Applicability of existing thresholds including minimum permitted wall thickness before isolation and corrosion damage categories for pipe designed to operate at stress levels not greater than 40% SMYS with hydrogen.
Finite Element Analysis (FEA) has been performed to assess the performance of existing carbon steel gas riser configurations when subjected to thermal loading to understand the suitability of converting the existing pipework to hydrogen.
This report was submitted to HSE for their assessment of the safety evidence for 100% hydrogen heating which can be found at Hydrogen heating: HSE assessment of the safety evidence - GOV.UK.
Queries should be directed to DESNZ: https://www.gov.uk/guidance/contact-desnz.
H21 Phase 2B: Planned Live Gas Operations
Mar 2026
Publication
In line with the UK government’s de-carbonisation strategy Northern Gas Network’s (NGN) H21 project aims to demonstrate the feasibility of converting the existing <7barg gas distribution network to 100% hydrogen. Following progress on Phase 1 of the H21 programme Phase 2 was proposed to build on the knowledge acquired to provide further quantified safety-based evidence on the suitability of the GB networks to transport 100% hydrogen. Phase 2 consisted of a number of Project Phases. Phase 2b evaluates network operational procedures in use with 100% hydrogen. Conducted on a repurposed part of the natural gas distribution network and identifying which of these are suitable for a 100% hydrogen network and those that may require adjustments. To achieve this a gas demonstration facility centred around an existing part of the gas network was built at South Bank Middlesbrough to accommodate operations within low pressure network parameters and typical network components. A Master Test Plan (MTP) for Phase 2 was subsequently developed by NGN in collaboration with the HSE and DNV to address various aspects of existing network procedures and operations including:
♦ Emergency Response and bad practice demonstrations
♦ Finding Leaks
♦ Accessing Leaks
♦ Assessment of repair techniques
♦ Planned live gas operations
♦ Isolation techniques
♦ Commissioning and decommissioning activities
♦ Pressure regulation and maintenance procedures
♦ Pressure and flow validation
Each practical test was derived from one of the above subcategories within the master test plan. This report details the work conducted within the Planned Live Gas Operation remit completed at the NGN H21 testing facility at South Bank. The programme included eight live gas operations undertaken on the buried hydrogen low pressure network within the South Bank test facility the network contained both metallic and PE mains with different diameters throughout the grid. This allowed operations to be undertaken in conditions mirroring real life as they would be completed out on the network. The objective of these experiments is to prove routine operations that are undertaken on a day-to-day basis on the NG distribution network can be completed on 100% hydrogen networks. This report details the experimental set-up operation procedures and method statements used in Section 3; the results and main observations in Section 4 followed by interpretation of results and conclusions in Section 5.
This report was submitted to HSE for their assessment of the safety evidence for 100% hydrogen heating which can be found at Hydrogen heating: HSE assessment of the safety evidence - GOV.UK.
Queries should be directed to DESNZ: https://www.gov.uk/guidance/contact-desnz.
♦ Emergency Response and bad practice demonstrations
♦ Finding Leaks
♦ Accessing Leaks
♦ Assessment of repair techniques
♦ Planned live gas operations
♦ Isolation techniques
♦ Commissioning and decommissioning activities
♦ Pressure regulation and maintenance procedures
♦ Pressure and flow validation
Each practical test was derived from one of the above subcategories within the master test plan. This report details the work conducted within the Planned Live Gas Operation remit completed at the NGN H21 testing facility at South Bank. The programme included eight live gas operations undertaken on the buried hydrogen low pressure network within the South Bank test facility the network contained both metallic and PE mains with different diameters throughout the grid. This allowed operations to be undertaken in conditions mirroring real life as they would be completed out on the network. The objective of these experiments is to prove routine operations that are undertaken on a day-to-day basis on the NG distribution network can be completed on 100% hydrogen networks. This report details the experimental set-up operation procedures and method statements used in Section 3; the results and main observations in Section 4 followed by interpretation of results and conclusions in Section 5.
This report was submitted to HSE for their assessment of the safety evidence for 100% hydrogen heating which can be found at Hydrogen heating: HSE assessment of the safety evidence - GOV.UK.
Queries should be directed to DESNZ: https://www.gov.uk/guidance/contact-desnz.
H21 Phase 2B T&M: Isolation
Mar 2026
Publication
In line with the UK government’s de-carbonisation strategy Northern Gas Network’s (NGN) H21 project aims to demonstrate the feasibility of converting the existing <7 barg gas distribution network to 100% hydrogen. After conversion of the gas networks hydrogen is transported from various sources through new and existing gas networks to industrial and domestic customers. Following progress on Phase 1 of the H21 programme Phase 2 was proposed to build on the knowledge acquired to provide further quantified safety-based evidence on the suitability of the GB networks to transport 100% hydrogen. Phase 2 consisted of a number of Project Phases. Phase 2b evaluates network operational procedures conducted on a repurposed natural gas network. Identifying which of these are suitable for a 100% hydrogen network and those that may require adjustments. To achieve this a gas demonstration facility was built at South Bank Middlesbrough to accommodate low pressure network parameters and typical network components. A Master Test Plan (MTP) for Phase 2 was subsequently developed by NGN in collaboration with the HSE and DNV to address various aspects of existing network procedures and operations including:
♦ Emergency Response and bad practice demonstrations
♦ Finding Leaks
♦ Accessing Leaks
♦ Assessment of repair techniques
♦ Planned live gas operations
♦ Isolation techniques
♦ Commissioning and decommissioning activities
♦ Pressure regulation and maintenance procedures
♦ Pressure and flow validation
Each practical test was derived from one of the above subcategories within the master test plan. This report details the work conducted within the Isolation Operations remit completed at the NGN H21 testing facility at South Bank. The programme included four isolation operations utilising different isolation techniques and was undertaken on the buried hydrogen low pressure network within the South Bank test facility. The network contained both metallic and PE mains with different diameters throughout the grid. This allowed operations to be undertaken in conditions mirroring real life as they would be completed out on the network. The objective of these experiments is to prove routine operations that are undertaken on a day-to-day basis on the NG distribution network can be completed on 100% hydrogen networks. This report details the experimental set-up isolation procedure and method statement used in Section 3; the results and main observations in Section 4 followed by interpretation of results and conclusions in Section 5. Appendixes at the back of the document contain photographs diagrams and further details for each test.
♦ Emergency Response and bad practice demonstrations
♦ Finding Leaks
♦ Accessing Leaks
♦ Assessment of repair techniques
♦ Planned live gas operations
♦ Isolation techniques
♦ Commissioning and decommissioning activities
♦ Pressure regulation and maintenance procedures
♦ Pressure and flow validation
Each practical test was derived from one of the above subcategories within the master test plan. This report details the work conducted within the Isolation Operations remit completed at the NGN H21 testing facility at South Bank. The programme included four isolation operations utilising different isolation techniques and was undertaken on the buried hydrogen low pressure network within the South Bank test facility. The network contained both metallic and PE mains with different diameters throughout the grid. This allowed operations to be undertaken in conditions mirroring real life as they would be completed out on the network. The objective of these experiments is to prove routine operations that are undertaken on a day-to-day basis on the NG distribution network can be completed on 100% hydrogen networks. This report details the experimental set-up isolation procedure and method statement used in Section 3; the results and main observations in Section 4 followed by interpretation of results and conclusions in Section 5. Appendixes at the back of the document contain photographs diagrams and further details for each test.
H21 Phase 2A Testing - Part A: Planned Live Gas Operations and Isolation Techniques
Mar 2026
Publication
In line with the UK government’s de-carbonisation strategy Northern Gas Network’s (NGN) H21 project aims to demonstrate the feasibility of converting the existing <7barg gas distribution network to 100% hydrogen. After conversion of the gas networks hydrogen could be transported from various sources through new and existing gas networks to industrial and domestic customers.
Following progress on Phase 1 of the H21 programme Phase 2 was proposed to build on the knowledge acquired to provide further quantified safety-based evidence on the suitability of the GB networks to transport 100% hydrogen. Phase 2 consisted of a number of Project Phases. Phase 2a evaluates network operational procedures identifying which of these are suitable for a 100% hydrogen network and those that may require adjustments. To achieve this a gas demonstration network was built at DNV Spadeadam Research and Development to accommodate full scale network parameters including typical network components. A Master Test Plan (MTP) was subsequently developed by NGN in collaboration with the HSE Science and Research Centre (HSE S\&RC) and DNV to address various aspects of existing network procedures and operations including:
♦ Emergency Response and bad practice demonstrations
♦ Finding leaks
♦ Accessing leaks
♦ Assessment of repair techniques
♦ Live gas operations
♦ Isolation techniques
♦ Commissioning and decommissioning activities (i.e. purging)
♦ Pressure regulation and maintenance procedures
♦ Pressure and flow validation
Each of these areas of testing and assessments were then divided in individual tests or tasks and identified with a unique ID name.
The current report details the work conducted on the H21 demonstration grid herein referred to as “Microgrid” in relation to planned live gas operations and isolation techniques. The programme included assessing the effectiveness of existing flow stopping techniques by measurement of the let-by rate downstream of the flow stopping device. The flow stopping techniques demonstrated included: a metallic stopple squeeze off ALH bag off and an MLS bag off. These techniques were performed by third parties according to Method Statements and Risk Assessments modified for the application to hydrogen. Principally the outcome of the Procedural Review conducted by HSE S\&RC1 was that flammable atmospheres within and around the tools pipework and vents as currently operated could not be tolerated as for hydrogen operations. As such the techniques were all conducted with the introduction of nitrogen inerting steps to avoid hydrogen and air mixing within any confined geometries.
This report was submitted to HSE for their assessment of the safety evidence for 100% hydrogen heating which can be found at Hydrogen heating: HSE assessment of the safety evidence - GOV.UK.
Queries should be directed to DESNZ: https://www.gov.uk/guidance/contact-desnz.
Following progress on Phase 1 of the H21 programme Phase 2 was proposed to build on the knowledge acquired to provide further quantified safety-based evidence on the suitability of the GB networks to transport 100% hydrogen. Phase 2 consisted of a number of Project Phases. Phase 2a evaluates network operational procedures identifying which of these are suitable for a 100% hydrogen network and those that may require adjustments. To achieve this a gas demonstration network was built at DNV Spadeadam Research and Development to accommodate full scale network parameters including typical network components. A Master Test Plan (MTP) was subsequently developed by NGN in collaboration with the HSE Science and Research Centre (HSE S\&RC) and DNV to address various aspects of existing network procedures and operations including:
♦ Emergency Response and bad practice demonstrations
♦ Finding leaks
♦ Accessing leaks
♦ Assessment of repair techniques
♦ Live gas operations
♦ Isolation techniques
♦ Commissioning and decommissioning activities (i.e. purging)
♦ Pressure regulation and maintenance procedures
♦ Pressure and flow validation
Each of these areas of testing and assessments were then divided in individual tests or tasks and identified with a unique ID name.
The current report details the work conducted on the H21 demonstration grid herein referred to as “Microgrid” in relation to planned live gas operations and isolation techniques. The programme included assessing the effectiveness of existing flow stopping techniques by measurement of the let-by rate downstream of the flow stopping device. The flow stopping techniques demonstrated included: a metallic stopple squeeze off ALH bag off and an MLS bag off. These techniques were performed by third parties according to Method Statements and Risk Assessments modified for the application to hydrogen. Principally the outcome of the Procedural Review conducted by HSE S\&RC1 was that flammable atmospheres within and around the tools pipework and vents as currently operated could not be tolerated as for hydrogen operations. As such the techniques were all conducted with the introduction of nitrogen inerting steps to avoid hydrogen and air mixing within any confined geometries.
This report was submitted to HSE for their assessment of the safety evidence for 100% hydrogen heating which can be found at Hydrogen heating: HSE assessment of the safety evidence - GOV.UK.
Queries should be directed to DESNZ: https://www.gov.uk/guidance/contact-desnz.
H21 Phase 2: Assessment of Repair Techniques
Mar 2026
Publication
In line with the UK government’s de-carbonisation strategy Northern Gas Network’s (NGN) H21 project aims to enable the conversion of the UK gas networks to pure hydrogen. After conversion of the gas networks hydrogen is transported from various sources through new and existing gas networks to industrial and domestic customers.
Following progress on Phase 1 of the H21 programme Phase 2 was proposed to build on the knowledge acquired to provide further quantified safety-based evidence on the suitability of the GB networks to transport 100% hydrogen. Phase 2 consisted of a number of Project Phases. Phase 2a evaluates network components and procedures identifying which of these are suitable for a 100% hydrogen network and those that may require adjustments. To achieve this a gas demonstration network was built at DNV Spadeadam Research and Testing to accommodate full scale network parameters and typical network components. A Master Test Plan (MTP) was subsequently developed by NGN in collaboration with the HSE and DNV to address various aspects of existing network procedures and operations including:
♦ Emergency Response and bad practice demonstrations
♦ Finding leaks
♦ Accessing leaks
♦ Assessment of repair techniques
♦ Live gas operations
♦ Isolation techniques
♦ Commissioning and decommissioning activities
♦ Pressure regulation and maintenance procedures
♦ Pressure and flow validation
Each of these areas of testing and assessments were then divided in individual tests or tasks and identified with a unique ID name.
The current technical note details the work conducted in the H21 demonstration grid herein referred to as “Microgrid” in relation to assessment of repair techniques. Six used cast iron (CI) spun iron (SI) and steel (ST) assets purposedly made to present leaks or leak paths were repaired using six commonly used techniques in the current natural gas network including: muffed encapsulation anaerobic repair two-part joint injection polyform repair clamp repair and heat shrink repair. The repairs were then leak checked with nitrogen buried and connected to the H21 microgrid and commissioned with hydrogen. Weekly over the course of five months whilst the rest of the testing programme was being carried out the assets were individually isolated and checked for re-appearance of leakage over time and under service conditions by means of pressure decay tests.
This report was submitted to HSE for their assessment of the safety evidence for 100% hydrogen heating which can be found at Hydrogen heating: HSE assessment of the safety evidence - GOV.UK.
Queries should be directed to DESNZ: https://www.gov.uk/guidance/contact-desnz.
Following progress on Phase 1 of the H21 programme Phase 2 was proposed to build on the knowledge acquired to provide further quantified safety-based evidence on the suitability of the GB networks to transport 100% hydrogen. Phase 2 consisted of a number of Project Phases. Phase 2a evaluates network components and procedures identifying which of these are suitable for a 100% hydrogen network and those that may require adjustments. To achieve this a gas demonstration network was built at DNV Spadeadam Research and Testing to accommodate full scale network parameters and typical network components. A Master Test Plan (MTP) was subsequently developed by NGN in collaboration with the HSE and DNV to address various aspects of existing network procedures and operations including:
♦ Emergency Response and bad practice demonstrations
♦ Finding leaks
♦ Accessing leaks
♦ Assessment of repair techniques
♦ Live gas operations
♦ Isolation techniques
♦ Commissioning and decommissioning activities
♦ Pressure regulation and maintenance procedures
♦ Pressure and flow validation
Each of these areas of testing and assessments were then divided in individual tests or tasks and identified with a unique ID name.
The current technical note details the work conducted in the H21 demonstration grid herein referred to as “Microgrid” in relation to assessment of repair techniques. Six used cast iron (CI) spun iron (SI) and steel (ST) assets purposedly made to present leaks or leak paths were repaired using six commonly used techniques in the current natural gas network including: muffed encapsulation anaerobic repair two-part joint injection polyform repair clamp repair and heat shrink repair. The repairs were then leak checked with nitrogen buried and connected to the H21 microgrid and commissioned with hydrogen. Weekly over the course of five months whilst the rest of the testing programme was being carried out the assets were individually isolated and checked for re-appearance of leakage over time and under service conditions by means of pressure decay tests.
This report was submitted to HSE for their assessment of the safety evidence for 100% hydrogen heating which can be found at Hydrogen heating: HSE assessment of the safety evidence - GOV.UK.
Queries should be directed to DESNZ: https://www.gov.uk/guidance/contact-desnz.
HyNTS Pipeline Dataset SIF Project Discovery Phase: Final Report
Mar 2026
Publication
Rosen,
Cadent and
National Grid
HyNTS is a programme of work that seeks to identify the opportunities and address the challenges that transporting hydrogen within the National Transmission System (NTS) and Local Transmission System (LTS) presents. This will unlock the potential of hydrogen to deliver the UK’s 2050 Net Zero targets. The programme is being executed alongside other ongoing UK hydrogen initiatives such as National Grids Project Union and Cadent’s HyNet projects.
A key element of repurposing feasibility and therefore central to the overall HyNTS initiative is the requirement to have an improved understanding of the ‘fingerprint’ of pipeline assets prior to hydrogen injection. The Pipeline Dataset SIF project has two primary objectives:
♦ Defining and gathering the data necessary to ultimately facilitate repurposing of above 7 bar pipelines on the NTS and LTS
♦ Developing the tools and processes to store align and visualise data
Split into 3 phases the first ‘Discovery’ phase aims to develop the high-level data and data management requirements for repurposing as well as the current data availability across the NTS and LTS to meet these requirements. Subsequent Alpha and Beta phases involve detailed planning and subsequent execution of the data collection and data management activities identified in the Discovery phase.
The Discovery phase comprises four Workpacks as shown in the diagram below designed to cover the project objectives.
ROSEN and Cadent have partnered with National Grid (NGG) to deliver the Discovery phase. Close collaboration between NGG Cadent and ROSEN has been required to conduct all Workpacks particularly in terms of appraising the current data held and current Data Management arrangements within both organisations.
This report presents the findings from the Discovery Phase as well as providing recommendations to feed into shaping subsequent Alpha and Beta phase activities.
This report was submitted to HSE for their assessment of the safety evidence for 100% hydrogen heating which can be found at Hydrogen heating: HSE assessment of the safety evidence - GOV.UK.
Queries should be directed to DESNZ: https://www.gov.uk/guidance/contact-desnz.
A key element of repurposing feasibility and therefore central to the overall HyNTS initiative is the requirement to have an improved understanding of the ‘fingerprint’ of pipeline assets prior to hydrogen injection. The Pipeline Dataset SIF project has two primary objectives:
♦ Defining and gathering the data necessary to ultimately facilitate repurposing of above 7 bar pipelines on the NTS and LTS
♦ Developing the tools and processes to store align and visualise data
Split into 3 phases the first ‘Discovery’ phase aims to develop the high-level data and data management requirements for repurposing as well as the current data availability across the NTS and LTS to meet these requirements. Subsequent Alpha and Beta phases involve detailed planning and subsequent execution of the data collection and data management activities identified in the Discovery phase.
The Discovery phase comprises four Workpacks as shown in the diagram below designed to cover the project objectives.
ROSEN and Cadent have partnered with National Grid (NGG) to deliver the Discovery phase. Close collaboration between NGG Cadent and ROSEN has been required to conduct all Workpacks particularly in terms of appraising the current data held and current Data Management arrangements within both organisations.
This report presents the findings from the Discovery Phase as well as providing recommendations to feed into shaping subsequent Alpha and Beta phase activities.
This report was submitted to HSE for their assessment of the safety evidence for 100% hydrogen heating which can be found at Hydrogen heating: HSE assessment of the safety evidence - GOV.UK.
Queries should be directed to DESNZ: https://www.gov.uk/guidance/contact-desnz.
FutureGrid Phase 1: Facility, Closure Report
Mar 2026
Publication
The National Transmission System (NTS) is a cornerstone of the Great Britain’s (GB) energy infrastructure transporting over 800 TWh of energy annually across 5000 miles of pipelines in the UK.
This system provides GB with a significant opportunity to decarbonise various industries by transporting low-carbon gases such as hydrogen biomethane and various synthetic fuels. Transitioning this system would also pave the way for industrial emitters to decarbonise either through fuel switching or transporting carbon dioxide to potential storage sites around the United Kingdom (UK). Recognising the imperative to transition to a low-carbon future the FutureGrid project sought to explore the feasibility of repurposing the NTS to transport hydrogen. This project an essential part of the National Gas HyNTS programme endeavours to align the NTS with GB’s net zero ambitions by demonstrating the operational viability of the system with varying hydrogen blends using decommissioned assets typical of the natural gas network today ultimately aiming for 100% hydrogen conveyance.
This report was submitted to HSE for their assessment of the safety evidence for 100% hydrogen heating which can be found at Hydrogen heating:HSE assessment of the safety evidence - GOV.UK.
Queries should be directed to DESNZ: https://www.gov.uk/guidance/contact-desnz.
This system provides GB with a significant opportunity to decarbonise various industries by transporting low-carbon gases such as hydrogen biomethane and various synthetic fuels. Transitioning this system would also pave the way for industrial emitters to decarbonise either through fuel switching or transporting carbon dioxide to potential storage sites around the United Kingdom (UK). Recognising the imperative to transition to a low-carbon future the FutureGrid project sought to explore the feasibility of repurposing the NTS to transport hydrogen. This project an essential part of the National Gas HyNTS programme endeavours to align the NTS with GB’s net zero ambitions by demonstrating the operational viability of the system with varying hydrogen blends using decommissioned assets typical of the natural gas network today ultimately aiming for 100% hydrogen conveyance.
This report was submitted to HSE for their assessment of the safety evidence for 100% hydrogen heating which can be found at Hydrogen heating:HSE assessment of the safety evidence - GOV.UK.
Queries should be directed to DESNZ: https://www.gov.uk/guidance/contact-desnz.
Inhibition of Hydrogen Embrittlement Effects in Pipeline Steel - Technical Report
Mar 2026
Publication
Rosen and
National Gas
National Gas has identified the need to understand the effects of hydrogen on various pipeline materials commonly found in the UK National Transmission System (NTS) to determine their potential for a hydrogen use case. Accordingly National Gas is interested in investigating the potential use of oxygen as a mitigation of hydrogen embrittlement (HE) the detrimental effect of hydrogen on the mechanical properties of metallic materials. This report presents the laboratory findings part of the project “Inhibition of hydrogen embrittlement effects in pipeline steels” in which ROSEN has been requested to investigate the potential use of oxygen as a mitigation of hydrogen effects.<br/>Three pipe materials were investigated which included a ERW X52 commissioned in 1993 a DSAW X60 commissioned in 1973 and a DSAW X80 constructed in 2004. The test programme aimed to characterise the effectiveness of oxygen on mitigating hydrogen embrittlement and included an in-air baseline characterisation and three main hydrogen tests: threshold stress intensity factor KIH fracture toughness and two types of fatigue crack growth rate tests (frequency scans and Paris curve). Fracture toughness and fatigue crack growth rate tests were performed in pure hydrogen and at various oxygen concentrations ranging from 50 to 1000 ppm.<br/>The baseline in-air characterisation showed that some of the mechanical properties of the X52 and X60 were below the T/SP/PIP/1 requirements. For the X52 the yield strength of transverse parent material specimens was below the 360 MPa required by its designation. For the X60 both the longitudinal and transverse yield strength of the parent material were below the 415 MPa required for this grade. Furthermore CVN energies were also below the T/SP/PIP/1 requirements for parent metal and seam weld metal for the X60 pipe. The X80 was within specifications.<br/>Threshold stress intensity factor KIH tests were performed on the three investigated materials on base and weld metal in pure hydrogen. Crack extension was not seen in any of these tests for the applied stress intensity factors as high as 73 MPa√m. The absence of crack growth was verified by means of SEM examination which showed the direct transition from the fatigue pre-crack region to the final fracture region. For this reason KIH tests with oxygen additions were not conducted.<br/>Fracture toughness testing showed that the fracture resistance was reduced when testing in pure hydrogen. This was seen in X60 specimens that had a fracture resistance JQ of 31 kJ/m2 35% of that in air. The addition of oxygen resulted in an increase of the average JQ which at 250 ppm O2 was 85% of the in air value. At concentrations above this value the fracture resistance continued to approach in-air values although at a decreased rate. Increasing the oxygen concentration also resulted in smaller standard deviations of the fracture resistance decreasing from 13 to 2 kJ/m2 as the O2 concentration was increased from 50 to 500 ppm. These findings indicate there is a smaller variability of the performance when oxygen is added. The recovery of the fracture resistance was consistent with the SEM examination of fracture surfaces of tested specimens. In pure hydrogen fracture surfaces were consistent with a quasi-cleavage fracture characterised by planar facets with visible river marks. As oxygen was increased the fracture surface became more dimpled and areas with signs of plastic strain became evident. At concentrations of 250 ppm O2 the fracture surface resembled those obtained in air suggesting the same ductile failure mode. Obtaining quantitative fracture toughness data for the X52 and X80 specimens in oxygen additions was not possible due to material related challenges. However fractographic examination showed that in pure hydrogen and low oxygen concentrations e.g. 50 ppm the failure mode was predominantly brittle while at 250 ppm O2 and in air the failure mode was ductile and was accompanied of limited crack growth.<br/>The inhibiting effects of oxygen were also seen in fatigue crack growth rate tests. Frequency scan tests on X60 showed that the exposure to hydrogen resulted in high crack growth rates up to 2 orders of magnitude above the BS7910 in-air mean depending on the testing conditions. Crack growth rates were affected by the choice of the frequency. For the test performed with a Kmax of 45 ksi√in (49 MPa√m) crack growth rates continued to increase above 1 mm/cycle as the frequency was reduced to 1E-4 Hz. For the test performed with a Kmax of 38 ksi√in (42 MPa√m) crack growth rates reached a plateau at a frequency of 0.1 Hz. The additions of oxygen resulted in a reduction of crack growth to values a few times above the BS7910 in-air mean. Furthermore the effect of frequency was visibly reduced in 250 ppm O2 as reducing the frequency 40000 times resulted only in a 2 times increase of the crack growth rates. The effect of oxygen was also seen in Paris curve types of tests. In pure hydrogen crack growth rates were comparable with ASME B31.12 and Sandia National Laboratories reference curves and were in general up to an order of magnitude above the BS7910 in-air mean depending on ΔK and other parameters. The additions of oxygen at concentrations as low as 50 ppm resulted in reductions in fatigue crack growth rates to values closer to those in air. Further increases in the oxygen concentration resulted in slight reductions of crack growth rates that were more noticeable at higher ΔK and Kmax. The recovery of the fatigue performance was consistent with the fractography observations. The addition of oxygen resulted in an overall increase of the plastic strain seen on the fracture surfaces. In pure hydrogen fracture surfaces were consistent with quasi-cleavage failure and had planar cleavage facets with river marks and very fine striations that were mostly visible at high frequencies and ΔK under high magnifications (55800x). The fracture surfaces of specimens tested in presence of oxygen resembled those seen in the in-air fatigue pre-crack region especially at high frequencies and high ΔK. At low frequencies and low ΔK the fracture surfaces resembled that of quasi-cleavage fracture although they had a ‘fibrous’ aspect with visible signs of plastic strain. Striations were readily visible on the fracture surfaces of all specimens tested in presence of oxygen and were more defined than those seen in pure hydrogen.<br/>Based on the data generated in this work a concentration of 250 ppm O2 is recommended as the minimum value to achieve inhibition of hydrogen effects. This concentration provided a recovery of 85% of the in-air fracture resistance and resulted in crack growth rates close to in-air levels. The fracture surfaces of specimens tested at this oxygen concentration generally showed ductile features consistent with higher toughness failure mechanisms.
NTS Materials Testing to Enable Hydrogen Injection in High Pressure Pipelines, Technical Summary Report
Mar 2026
Publication
DNV and
National Gas
National Gas is aiming to demonstrate the potential use of hydrogen in high pressure transmission pipelines and associated equipment through the FutureGrid NIC programme. This involves construction and operation of a realistic high pressure transmission system using decommissioned National Gas assets. The linepipe for the facility will be X-52 and X-65 grade steels. A key parameter for the facility is to operate at the current NTS pressure tier.
The most applicable pipeline design code is ASME B31.12 used in the USA and currently used by UK HSE for evaluating hydrogen pipeline designs. Hydrogen supplements to the IGEM/TD/1 and IGEM/TD/13 codes also refer to this standard. The code has prescriptive design methods for allowable pressures which would reduce the FutureGrid maximum allowable design pressure (MAOP) to below current NTS pressure. The code does however allow less prescriptive methods if the linepipe has been tested for fracture toughness and fatigue performance in hydrogen using a protocol as defined by ASME VIII Section 3 Article KD-10. This would potentially allow a higher MAOP for FutureGrid1.
A materials test programme has therefore been established to evaluate the fracture toughness and fatigue properties of the actual linepipe used for the FutureGrid facility. The X-52 and X-65 linepipe being used to construct the facility has been tested in hydrogen including realistic seam welds and girth welds. This data has been used to confirm an appropriate maximum operating pressure for the FutureGrid test facility by carrying out fracture mechanics analyses in accordance with the above standards.
The materials test programme also includes a task to generate similar fracture toughness and fatigue data for a wider range of materials within the NTS as described in Table 1 below. This report provides test results for all of these materials along with analysis and interpretation of the results. It therefore satisfies the reporting requirements associated with a number of milestones as follows:
• Task 7 “Update of Data Analysis/Design using additional X60 results”
• Task 19 “Completion of Task 3 Reporting”
• Task 20 “Completion of Task 4 & Associated Reporting”
At present the report does not include details of tests carried out within Task 17 “Sub-critical crack growth testing” as some of those tests are still ongoing. The report will be updated to include these data when the tests are complete.
This report was submitted to HSE for their assessment of the safety evidence for 100% hydrogen heating which can be found at Hydrogen heating: HSE assessment of the safety evidence - GOV.UK.
Queries should be directed to DESNZ: https://www.gov.uk/guidance/contact-desnz.
The most applicable pipeline design code is ASME B31.12 used in the USA and currently used by UK HSE for evaluating hydrogen pipeline designs. Hydrogen supplements to the IGEM/TD/1 and IGEM/TD/13 codes also refer to this standard. The code has prescriptive design methods for allowable pressures which would reduce the FutureGrid maximum allowable design pressure (MAOP) to below current NTS pressure. The code does however allow less prescriptive methods if the linepipe has been tested for fracture toughness and fatigue performance in hydrogen using a protocol as defined by ASME VIII Section 3 Article KD-10. This would potentially allow a higher MAOP for FutureGrid1.
A materials test programme has therefore been established to evaluate the fracture toughness and fatigue properties of the actual linepipe used for the FutureGrid facility. The X-52 and X-65 linepipe being used to construct the facility has been tested in hydrogen including realistic seam welds and girth welds. This data has been used to confirm an appropriate maximum operating pressure for the FutureGrid test facility by carrying out fracture mechanics analyses in accordance with the above standards.
The materials test programme also includes a task to generate similar fracture toughness and fatigue data for a wider range of materials within the NTS as described in Table 1 below. This report provides test results for all of these materials along with analysis and interpretation of the results. It therefore satisfies the reporting requirements associated with a number of milestones as follows:
• Task 7 “Update of Data Analysis/Design using additional X60 results”
• Task 19 “Completion of Task 3 Reporting”
• Task 20 “Completion of Task 4 & Associated Reporting”
At present the report does not include details of tests carried out within Task 17 “Sub-critical crack growth testing” as some of those tests are still ongoing. The report will be updated to include these data when the tests are complete.
This report was submitted to HSE for their assessment of the safety evidence for 100% hydrogen heating which can be found at Hydrogen heating: HSE assessment of the safety evidence - GOV.UK.
Queries should be directed to DESNZ: https://www.gov.uk/guidance/contact-desnz.
NGT Compressor Station FMEA for Hydrogen: FMEA Summary Report
Mar 2026
Publication
DNV and
National Grid
The project between DNV and NGT innovation is exploring the future impact of introducing hydrogen into the National Transmission System (NTS) network and specifically looking at the impact on the compressor station equipment. The consequent failure modes associated with the introduction of hydrogen will be assessed through Failure Mode Effect Analysis (FMEA).
The work scope includes:
• Perform a staged approach FMEA study Qualitative assessments determining the risk levels associated with the various components of the compressor trains.
• Perform the FMEA on each selected train type assessing the operational safety and environmental impact of H2 introduction.
Assessment has been made for two potential network gas types:
• 25% H2/NG blend
• 100% H2
The output is an FMEA on each generic compressor stations indicating the risk areas from H2 operation. This output will allow NGT to identify areas which require further assessment / action before H2 is introduced.
This report was submitted to HSE for their assessment of the safety evidence for 100% hydrogen heating which can be found at Hydrogen heating: HSE assessment of the safety evidence - GOV.UK.
Queries should be directed to DESNZ: https://www.gov.uk/guidance/contact-desnz.
The work scope includes:
• Perform a staged approach FMEA study Qualitative assessments determining the risk levels associated with the various components of the compressor trains.
• Perform the FMEA on each selected train type assessing the operational safety and environmental impact of H2 introduction.
Assessment has been made for two potential network gas types:
• 25% H2/NG blend
• 100% H2
The output is an FMEA on each generic compressor stations indicating the risk areas from H2 operation. This output will allow NGT to identify areas which require further assessment / action before H2 is introduced.
This report was submitted to HSE for their assessment of the safety evidence for 100% hydrogen heating which can be found at Hydrogen heating: HSE assessment of the safety evidence - GOV.UK.
Queries should be directed to DESNZ: https://www.gov.uk/guidance/contact-desnz.
SIF Discovery Project - Hydrogen Barrier Coatings for Gas Network Assets, Technical Summary Report: Hydrogen Barrier Coatings
Mar 2026
Publication
This report is the Technical Summary Report of the SIF Discovery project (10022648) Hydrogen Barrier Coatings for Gas Network Assets. This report summarises the hydrogen barrier coatings work packages undertaken in the project which were led by Ultima Forma Ltd with inputs from National Grid Gas Transmission.
Around 23 million homes in UK are currently heated by natural gas supplied via the National Transmission System. Green hydrogen generated via renewable energy has potential to be a zero-carbon replacement for natural gas for heating. Re-purposing the existing National Transmission System for the transmission of hydrogen gas in lieu of natural gas would provide resilience and storage rather than relying on transient production. However hydrogen has been shown to embrittle certain pipeline materials thereby reducing allowable operating parameters. Hydrogen barrier coatings applied to the internal surface of the pipeline assets could prevent the need to replace the assets and/or enable the operation of the network in a flexible and optimised manner.
This report builds on and summarises the recommendations arising from project deliverables D1: Potential Coating Materials Their Properties And Application Technologies D2: Use Cases Summary Report and D3: Analysis of Potential Coating Solutions. From D1 zinc cadmium copper tin aluminium and nickel were identified as strong candidate materials. From D2 pipework girth welds valves and filters were identified as high-priority assets able to provide diverse requirements. From D3 electroplating metal spraying and hot-dipping were identified as candidate coating technologies. These are all therefore further explored within this report but brought together to find solutions for the use cases and the technologies best suited for the candidate materials. Additionally due to the importance of the underlying surface quality prior to coating a section within the report was devoted to looking at surface preparation methods. This included paint removal chemical treatment and epoxy coating.
After bringing the various elements together it is clear that different technologies are suitable for different use cases. As zinc is suitable for all proposed coating technologies coating zinc is very mature and zinc is cheaper than tin it is recommended that further research be carried out on the hydrogen permeability of zinc. As hot-dipping is only suitable on the uncoated or paint striped steel and is unsuitable for many candidate materials it should likely not be a priority for further investigation and the focus should instead be on electroplating and cold spraying. For these technologies copper tin cadmium and nickel are suitable. Cadmium has a risk of toxicity tin is more expensive and nickel has a risk of embrittlement when not part of an alloy therefore promoting copper as the next most suitable candidate material for further research.
This Discovery phase has identified a number of candidate materials and application processes in order to successfully mitigate the risk of hydrogen to the existing National Transmission System and to allow for a greener hydrogen transition. A detailed plan for validating these processes and technologies has been made and set out in the follow-on Alpha phase application.
This report was submitted to HSE for their assessment of the safety evidence for 100% hydrogen heating which can be found at Hydrogen heating: HSE assessment of the safety evidence - GOV.UK.
Queries should be directed to DESNZ: https://www.gov.uk/guidance/contact-desnz.
Around 23 million homes in UK are currently heated by natural gas supplied via the National Transmission System. Green hydrogen generated via renewable energy has potential to be a zero-carbon replacement for natural gas for heating. Re-purposing the existing National Transmission System for the transmission of hydrogen gas in lieu of natural gas would provide resilience and storage rather than relying on transient production. However hydrogen has been shown to embrittle certain pipeline materials thereby reducing allowable operating parameters. Hydrogen barrier coatings applied to the internal surface of the pipeline assets could prevent the need to replace the assets and/or enable the operation of the network in a flexible and optimised manner.
This report builds on and summarises the recommendations arising from project deliverables D1: Potential Coating Materials Their Properties And Application Technologies D2: Use Cases Summary Report and D3: Analysis of Potential Coating Solutions. From D1 zinc cadmium copper tin aluminium and nickel were identified as strong candidate materials. From D2 pipework girth welds valves and filters were identified as high-priority assets able to provide diverse requirements. From D3 electroplating metal spraying and hot-dipping were identified as candidate coating technologies. These are all therefore further explored within this report but brought together to find solutions for the use cases and the technologies best suited for the candidate materials. Additionally due to the importance of the underlying surface quality prior to coating a section within the report was devoted to looking at surface preparation methods. This included paint removal chemical treatment and epoxy coating.
After bringing the various elements together it is clear that different technologies are suitable for different use cases. As zinc is suitable for all proposed coating technologies coating zinc is very mature and zinc is cheaper than tin it is recommended that further research be carried out on the hydrogen permeability of zinc. As hot-dipping is only suitable on the uncoated or paint striped steel and is unsuitable for many candidate materials it should likely not be a priority for further investigation and the focus should instead be on electroplating and cold spraying. For these technologies copper tin cadmium and nickel are suitable. Cadmium has a risk of toxicity tin is more expensive and nickel has a risk of embrittlement when not part of an alloy therefore promoting copper as the next most suitable candidate material for further research.
This Discovery phase has identified a number of candidate materials and application processes in order to successfully mitigate the risk of hydrogen to the existing National Transmission System and to allow for a greener hydrogen transition. A detailed plan for validating these processes and technologies has been made and set out in the follow-on Alpha phase application.
This report was submitted to HSE for their assessment of the safety evidence for 100% hydrogen heating which can be found at Hydrogen heating: HSE assessment of the safety evidence - GOV.UK.
Queries should be directed to DESNZ: https://www.gov.uk/guidance/contact-desnz.
Iron mains and fittings in hydrogen service
Mar 2026
Publication
Distribution Network Operators have investigated the potential to utilise iron mains and fittings in hydrogen service.
Iron mains operate at low (<75 mbarg.) or medium (<2 barg.) pressure iron fittings at up to intermediate pressure (<7 barg.) depending on design. No iron mains have been laid since the 1980s although certain grades of iron are still used to construct fittings which includes valves.
The work was conducted by DNV. It examined the impact that hydrogen might have on iron of different grades and also the risk of explosion posed by hydrogen if it escapes from a buried main. In carrying out the analysis no account was taken of additional mitigation measures associated with hydrogen conversion (e.g. in home detection) which would reduce risk to members of the public.
To enhance confidence at the request of Operators IGEM assembled a ‘Peer review panel’ of material science and risk modelling experts from a range of backgrounds. Their role was to express their professional opinion of the findings. The reports produced by DNV and the peer review panel are attached to this report in the appendix.
The conclusion is that iron fittings and most iron mains expected to be in operation after the current replacement programme is completed in December 2032 can operate in hydrogen service.
This report was submitted to HSE for their assessment of the safety evidence for 100% hydrogen heating which can be found at Hydrogen heating: HSE assessment of the safety evidence - GOV.UK.
Queries should be directed to DESNZ: https://www.gov.uk/guidance/contact-desnz.
Iron mains operate at low (<75 mbarg.) or medium (<2 barg.) pressure iron fittings at up to intermediate pressure (<7 barg.) depending on design. No iron mains have been laid since the 1980s although certain grades of iron are still used to construct fittings which includes valves.
The work was conducted by DNV. It examined the impact that hydrogen might have on iron of different grades and also the risk of explosion posed by hydrogen if it escapes from a buried main. In carrying out the analysis no account was taken of additional mitigation measures associated with hydrogen conversion (e.g. in home detection) which would reduce risk to members of the public.
To enhance confidence at the request of Operators IGEM assembled a ‘Peer review panel’ of material science and risk modelling experts from a range of backgrounds. Their role was to express their professional opinion of the findings. The reports produced by DNV and the peer review panel are attached to this report in the appendix.
The conclusion is that iron fittings and most iron mains expected to be in operation after the current replacement programme is completed in December 2032 can operate in hydrogen service.
This report was submitted to HSE for their assessment of the safety evidence for 100% hydrogen heating which can be found at Hydrogen heating: HSE assessment of the safety evidence - GOV.UK.
Queries should be directed to DESNZ: https://www.gov.uk/guidance/contact-desnz.
EUSE Hydrogen Purity - Contaminants Impact Materials in Domestic Installations
Mar 2026
Publication
The EUSE hydrogen purity project is investigating the impact of contaminants in a .pipeline network that has been repurposed from natural gas to hydrogen. With the focus on end users the impact of the contaminants on the pipework and appliance materials downstream of the Emergency Control Valve (ECV) to the appliance is considered and in addition the impact on the combustion of the hydrogen with the contaminants present.
DNV carried out a review using its own experience together with information from IGEM standards and information collated as part of the BEIS Hy4Heat programme to identify the most abundant material types that are present in domestic installations. This data was supplemented by information from Cadent on the surveys that were undertaken as part of the Whitby Village trial.
This report was submitted to HSE for their assessment of the safety evidence for 100% hydrogen heating which can be found at Hydrogen heating: HSE assessment of the safety evidence - GOV.UK.
Queries should be directed to DESNZ: https://www.gov.uk/guidance/contact-desnz.
DNV carried out a review using its own experience together with information from IGEM standards and information collated as part of the BEIS Hy4Heat programme to identify the most abundant material types that are present in domestic installations. This data was supplemented by information from Cadent on the surveys that were undertaken as part of the Whitby Village trial.
This report was submitted to HSE for their assessment of the safety evidence for 100% hydrogen heating which can be found at Hydrogen heating: HSE assessment of the safety evidence - GOV.UK.
Queries should be directed to DESNZ: https://www.gov.uk/guidance/contact-desnz.
Technical Summary of the NGGT and Partners' Feasibility Study of Hydrogen Fuel Gas for NTS Compressors
Mar 2026
Publication
This Networks Innovation Allowance (NIA) funded project (NIA_NGGT0176) comprised a feasibility study on an exemplar National Grid Gas Transmission (NGGT) National Transmission System (NTS) compressor station. The study has examined safety environmental technical operational and economic issues in blending hydrogen/methane for combustion in a gas turbine (GT) driving NTS compression. The project also determined how to establish an innovative green hydrogen production storage and supply facility to fuel GTs on varying hydrogen/methane blends.
This strategic study is preparatory work ahead of demonstration on an NTS compressor station which precedes hydrogen blending in NTS compressors as ‘business as usual’. Higher hydrogen concentrations may be achieved in the GTs in advance of similar blends within the transmission pipes. As such this strategic and innovative project could de-risk the hydrogen transition of GT compression operations and bring forward CO2 and NOx reductions.
For the feasibility study two scenarios have been assessed: co-firing with 25%/75% vol hydrogen/natural gas blend and 100% vol hydrogen.
The study found it is viable to run the Siemens Energy SGT-A20 GTs on blends of hydrogen and natural gas up to 100% hydrogen and there are historic examples of this type of GT doing so without detriment.
This report was submitted to HSE for their assessment of the safety evidence for 100% hydrogen heating which can be found at Hydrogen heating: HSE assessment of the safety evidence - GOV.UK.
Queries should be directed to DESNZ: https://www.gov.uk/guidance/contact-desnz
This strategic study is preparatory work ahead of demonstration on an NTS compressor station which precedes hydrogen blending in NTS compressors as ‘business as usual’. Higher hydrogen concentrations may be achieved in the GTs in advance of similar blends within the transmission pipes. As such this strategic and innovative project could de-risk the hydrogen transition of GT compression operations and bring forward CO2 and NOx reductions.
For the feasibility study two scenarios have been assessed: co-firing with 25%/75% vol hydrogen/natural gas blend and 100% vol hydrogen.
The study found it is viable to run the Siemens Energy SGT-A20 GTs on blends of hydrogen and natural gas up to 100% hydrogen and there are historic examples of this type of GT doing so without detriment.
This report was submitted to HSE for their assessment of the safety evidence for 100% hydrogen heating which can be found at Hydrogen heating: HSE assessment of the safety evidence - GOV.UK.
Queries should be directed to DESNZ: https://www.gov.uk/guidance/contact-desnz
Hydrogen Impact on Pipeline Cathodic Protection Performance and External Coating Degradation
Mar 2026
Publication
National Grid Gas Transmission (NGGT) contracted Rosen UK Ltd (Rosen) and The University of Warwick UK (Warwick) to conduct a literature review on the subject of “impact of hydrogen conveyance on the performance of cathodic protection (CP) and pipeline coating degradation”. NGGT’s motivation for this project comes as part of the route to Net Zero with NGGT looking at opportunities to increase the percentage of hydrogen transported within natural gas. As the percentage of hydrogen increases there may be increased risk for the evolution of atomic hydrogen which could permeate through the steel pipe and affect external coatings and the efficacy of CP polarization potentials. Pertaining to the above NGGT’s goal is to gain an appreciation of the work that has been undertaken on coatings and CP systems of hydrogen pipelines and what corrosion protection currently utilized on hydrogen pipelines worldwide as well as reported effects of hydrogen on the behaviour of coating
types with or without impressed voltage. Specifically the focus was to identify potential impacts of hydrogen on coating performance adhesion and CP polarization for differing concentration levels of hydrogen being transported at a range of pressures for:
1. A selection of applied and factory coatings and coating types both for a range of aged and new applications.
2. A selection of coating holiday (coating defect) sizes at varying levels of CP polarization.
The project was divided into three work packages:
1. Work Package 1: Literature Review – Rosen as an Industrial Partner.
2. Work Package 2: Literature Review – Warwick as an Academic Partner.
3. Work Package 3: Reporting – presented as a joint effort between Rosen and Warwick.
During the execution of the projects all parties involved participated in two interactive on-line workshops; Workshop 1 was held on the 20th of December 2022 and Workshop 2 on the 2nd of May 2023. Both workshops served as platforms for sharing work progress and obtained results and their discussion; presentation slides delivered at both workshops can be found in Appendix A – Workshop 1 Presentations and Appendix B – Workshop 2 Presentation.
The current document presents the final stage of the project i.e. Work Package 3.
This report was submitted to HSE for their assessment of the safety evidence for 100% hydrogen heating which can be found at Hydrogen heating: HSE assessment of the safety evidence - GOV.UK.
Queries should be directed to DESNZ: https://www.gov.uk/guidance/contact-desnz.
types with or without impressed voltage. Specifically the focus was to identify potential impacts of hydrogen on coating performance adhesion and CP polarization for differing concentration levels of hydrogen being transported at a range of pressures for:
1. A selection of applied and factory coatings and coating types both for a range of aged and new applications.
2. A selection of coating holiday (coating defect) sizes at varying levels of CP polarization.
The project was divided into three work packages:
1. Work Package 1: Literature Review – Rosen as an Industrial Partner.
2. Work Package 2: Literature Review – Warwick as an Academic Partner.
3. Work Package 3: Reporting – presented as a joint effort between Rosen and Warwick.
During the execution of the projects all parties involved participated in two interactive on-line workshops; Workshop 1 was held on the 20th of December 2022 and Workshop 2 on the 2nd of May 2023. Both workshops served as platforms for sharing work progress and obtained results and their discussion; presentation slides delivered at both workshops can be found in Appendix A – Workshop 1 Presentations and Appendix B – Workshop 2 Presentation.
The current document presents the final stage of the project i.e. Work Package 3.
This report was submitted to HSE for their assessment of the safety evidence for 100% hydrogen heating which can be found at Hydrogen heating: HSE assessment of the safety evidence - GOV.UK.
Queries should be directed to DESNZ: https://www.gov.uk/guidance/contact-desnz.
HyNTS Pipeline Dataset Aplha Phase: Final Technical Report
Mar 2026
Publication
Rosen,
National Gas and
Cadent
HyNTS is a programme of work that seeks to identify the opportunities and address the challenges that transporting hydrogen within the National Transmission System (NTS) presents. This will unlock the potential of hydrogen to deliver the UK’s 2050 Net Zero targets. The programme will feed into a number of ongoing hydrogen initiatives such as Project Union which has the aim of creating a UK hydrogen transmission backbone for the UK using repurposed and new-build infrastructure.
The Pipeline Dataset SIF project has two primary objectives.
♦ Defining and gathering the data necessary to ultimately facilitate repurposing of above 7 bar pipelines on the NTS and LTS.
♦ Developing the tools and processes to store align and visualise data to facilitate effective Integrity Management decision-making during post-repurposing service.
This report provides a summary of the work completed in the HyNTS Pipeline Dataset project Alpha phase to address these objectives.
This report was submitted to HSE for their assessment of the safety evidence for 100% hydrogen heating which can be found at Hydrogen heating: HSE assessment of the safety evidence - GOV.UK.
Queries should be directed to DESNZ: https://www.gov.uk/guidance/contact-desnz.
The Pipeline Dataset SIF project has two primary objectives.
♦ Defining and gathering the data necessary to ultimately facilitate repurposing of above 7 bar pipelines on the NTS and LTS.
♦ Developing the tools and processes to store align and visualise data to facilitate effective Integrity Management decision-making during post-repurposing service.
This report provides a summary of the work completed in the HyNTS Pipeline Dataset project Alpha phase to address these objectives.
This report was submitted to HSE for their assessment of the safety evidence for 100% hydrogen heating which can be found at Hydrogen heating: HSE assessment of the safety evidence - GOV.UK.
Queries should be directed to DESNZ: https://www.gov.uk/guidance/contact-desnz.
HyNTS Compression, Alpha Technical Report
Mar 2026
Publication
The HyNTS Compression project investigates the key challenges associated with compression of hydrogen and hydrogen blends through NTS assets. The project will determine the most cost-effective technically feasible solution for hydrogen compression on the NTS and develop the strategy for hydrogen compression. The alpha phase of the project has focussed on the following before progression to the beta phase of the project:
• Business case and Requirements for hydrogen compression
• Gas Turbine System
• Compression System
• Ancillary Equipment
• Demonstration Facility Development
The conceptual design development has concluded that it is possible to repurpose existing compression assets to demonstrate their capability of operating with 100% hydrogen. This will obtain the evidence necessary to update the Safety Case to enable deployment across the NTS. This phase of work further reinforces the importance of carrying out a demonstration to gather evidence of how repurposed compression assets would operate and the impact this would have on their performance. If repurposing NTS compression assets for hydrogen service can be proven there is potential for huge savings when realised across the entire NTS compression fleet.
This report was submitted to HSE for their assessment of the safety evidence for 100% hydrogen heating which can be found at Hydrogen heating: HSE assessment of the safety evidence - GOV.UK.
Queries should be directed to DESNZ: https://www.gov.uk/guidance/contact-desnz.
• Business case and Requirements for hydrogen compression
• Gas Turbine System
• Compression System
• Ancillary Equipment
• Demonstration Facility Development
The conceptual design development has concluded that it is possible to repurpose existing compression assets to demonstrate their capability of operating with 100% hydrogen. This will obtain the evidence necessary to update the Safety Case to enable deployment across the NTS. This phase of work further reinforces the importance of carrying out a demonstration to gather evidence of how repurposed compression assets would operate and the impact this would have on their performance. If repurposing NTS compression assets for hydrogen service can be proven there is potential for huge savings when realised across the entire NTS compression fleet.
This report was submitted to HSE for their assessment of the safety evidence for 100% hydrogen heating which can be found at Hydrogen heating: HSE assessment of the safety evidence - GOV.UK.
Queries should be directed to DESNZ: https://www.gov.uk/guidance/contact-desnz.
Multiphysical Coupling Analysis of Sealing Performance of Underground Lined Caverns for Hydrogen Storage
Nov 2025
Publication
Shaodong Cui,
Yin Li,
Junwu Zou and
Yun Chen
The accurate analysis of the sealing performance of underground lined cavern hydrogen storage is critical for enhancing the stability and economic viability of storage facilities. This study conducts an innovative investigation into hydrogen leakage behavior by developing a multiphysical coupled model for a composite system of support structures and surrounding rock in the operation process. By integrating Fick’s first law with the steady-state gas permeation equation the gas leakage rates of stainless steel and polymer sealing layers are quantified respectively. The Arrhenius equation is employed to characterize the effects of temperature on hydrogen permeability and the evolution of gas permeability. Thermalmechanical coupled effects across different materials within the storage system are further considered to accurately capture the hydrogen leakage process. The reliability of the established model is validated against analytical solutions and operational data from a real underground compressed air storage facility. The applicability of four materials— stainless steel epoxy resin (EP) ethylene–vinyl alcohol copolymer (EVOH) and polyimide (PI)—as sealing layers in underground hydrogen storage caverns is evaluated and the influences of four operational parameters (initial temperature initial pressure hydrogen injection temperature and injection–production rate) on sealing layer performance are also systematically investigated. The results indicate that all four materials satisfy the required sealing performance standards with stainless steel and EP demonstrating superior sealing performance. The initial temperature of the storage and the injection temperature of hydrogen significantly affect the circumferential stress in the sealing layer—a 10 K increase in initial temperature leads to an 11% rise in circumferential stress while a 10 K increase in injection temperature results in a 10% increase. In addition the initial storage pressure and the hydrogen injection rate exhibit a considerable influence on airtightness—a 1 MPa increase in initial pressure raises the leakage rate by 11% and a 20 kg/s increase in injection rate leads to a 12% increase in leakage. This study provides a theoretical foundation for sealing material selection and parameter optimization in practical engineering applications of underground lined caverns for hydrogen storage.
No more items...