United Kingdom

: Hydrogen is a clean non-polluting fuel and a key player in decarbonizing the energy sector. Interest in hydrogen production has grown due to climate change concerns and the need for sustainable alternatives. Despite advancements in waste-to-hydrogen technologies the efficient conversion of mixed plastic waste via an integrated thermochemical process remains insufficiently explored. This study introduces a novel multi-stage pyrolysis-reforming framework to maximize hydrogen yield from mixed plastic waste including polyethylene (HDPE) polypropylene (PP) and polystyrene (PS). Hydrogen yield optimization is achieved through the integration of two water–gas shift reactors and a pressure swing adsorption unit enabling hydrogen production rates of up to 31.85 kmol/h (64.21 kg/h) from 300 kg/h of mixed plastic wastes consisting of 100 kg/h each of HDPE PP and PS. Key process parameters were evaluated revealing that increasing reforming temperature from 500 ◦C to 1000 ◦C boosts hydrogen yield by 83.53% although gains beyond 700 ◦C are minimal. Higher reforming pressures reduce hydrogen and carbon monoxide yields while a steam-to-plastic ratio of two enhances production efficiency. This work highlights a novel scalable and thermochemically efficient strategy for valorizing mixed plastic waste into hydrogen contributing to circular economy goals and sustainable energy transition.

This paper presents a comprehensive thermo-economic analysis of a novel Power-to-X (P2X) polygeneration system designed for the production of hydrogen ammonia and methanol with near-zero CO2 emissions. The system integrates an air separation unit (ASU) a direct oxy-combustor (DOC) powered by natural gas combined with a supercritical carbon dioxide (sCO2) power cycle water electrolyzer (WE) a Haber-Bosch process (HBP) and a methanol production unit (MPU). The system is investigated in four configurations: ASU + DOC-sCO2 (S1) ASU + DOC-sCO2 + WE (S2) ASU + DOC-sCO2 + WE + HBP (S3) and ASU + DOC-sCO2 + WE + HBP + MPU (S4) each contributing to improve energy efficiency and reduced emissions. Simulation results show that the overall system efficiency reaches 56 % improving from 45 % to 56 % across different configurations. The system’s levelized cost of hydrogen (LCOH) decreases significantly from $1.70/kg to $0.80/kg and the levelized cost of electricity (LCOE) decreases from 4.30 ¢/kWh to 3.30 ¢/kWh. CO2 emissions are reduced from 200 gCO2/ MWe to 145 gCO2/MWe with the CO2 reduction rate improving from 89 % to 94 %. These results demonstrate the economic viability and environmental sustainability of the proposed P2X system paving the way for industrial decarbonization and large-scale deployment in future energy infrastructures.

The UK has set an ambitious target of delivering clean power by 2030. Low carbon dispatchable power generation using hydrogen will play a key role in a clean power system by providing flexibility and other services for system operability and also by providing supply adequacy during extended periods of low renewable output decarbonising the role currently performed by an aging portfolio of unabated natural gas power generation. While some 100% hydrogen to power (H2P) commercial projects are already being deployed globally using multi megawatt fuel cells alongside blending hydrogen into existing gas turbines and new hydrogen ready turbines industrial scale 100% H2P projects face additional challenges of deploying new technology into a nascent system one which requires significant volumes of hydrogen storage with long lead times. To achieve the 2030 clean power system ambition and lay the foundations for a clean resilient and secure power system beyond 2030 it is critical that the new government takes resolute actions now to support H2P at scale. A clear strategic plan should be developed within the first 12 months of the new administration with clarity being given on policy business models and deployment rates for hydrogen to power (H2P) and its enabling infrastructure. This report produced by Hydrogen UK’s Power Generation Working Group explores the role that H2P will play in the decarbonised power system of the future the barriers to deployment and recommendations for overcoming them.

This paper can be found on their website.

Low carbon hydrogen has a fundamental role to play in not one but two of the UK Government’s core missions. First it can help grow the economy - with thousands of new jobs and opportunities breathing new life into our industrial heartlands. Second it can help the UK become a clean energy superpower by using clean secure energy that we control. Third it can future-proof the UK’s foundational industries delivering decarbonisation and energy security to the hard-to-abate sectors which underpin the UK economy. Hydrogen developers across our membership report growing interest from customers in a wide range of sectors. Whilst current government policy has helped start the hydrogen economy industry wants this to accelerate and become more holistic so that interest is translated into demand allowing the sector to fully develop and the UK to meet its decarbonisation targets. With growing international competition the UK Government should prioritise the growth of hydrogen technology implementation leveraging the nation’s natural geological and geographical advantages. Although £20 billion in private capital investment is estimated to be ready to support the UK Government’s hydrogen ambitions persistent delays and market uncertainty risk this funding being lost to other markets. This report outlines the importance of Driving Demand for offtakers complementing the strong market foundation built from Government’s early hydrogen production focus. For effective policy implementation industry stakeholders have highlighted the importance of finding balance: retaining low-carbon technology optionality alongside certainty and support for investment with the adoption of a clear ‘vision’ and ‘market creation’ supported by a tailored mix of ‘carrots and sticks’ to support the market. From the research conducted by HUK it is clear that the choice of decarbonisation options is not done on a sector-by-sector basis that even within companies the decision-making process is site-by-site. This reflects the sensitivity of numerous factors that will ultimately determine the best solution for their site and re-enforces the view that customers must be allowed the choice of decarbonisation options. Hydrogen will play a significant role in decarbonising some of the hardest to abate sectors of the UK economy complimenting the role of electrification CCUS and other decarbonisation technologies. These sectors represent the hardest and therefore most expensive to decarbonise. However hydrogen also provides an opportunity to deliver significant economic growth through a thriving domestic supply chain and so a holistic approach should be applied.

The paper can be found on their website.

The decarbonization of energy systems poses significant challenges to energy networks due to the introduction of new energy vectors and changes in the pattern of energy demand. However this is currently an under-researched area. This paper addresses a gap in the literature by drawing on the socio-technological transitions and multi-system interactions literature to explore the views of experts from industry academia and other sectors about the challenges facing UK energy networks and the possible solutions including taking a more wholistic approach to the planning and operation of dierent networks. Using these frameworks we have demonstrated that systems can be deliberately integrated to interact and solve particular system challenges and have identified the nature of these interactions. The empirical results identify areas of consensus and disagreement about the future development of network infrastructure and regulation. They also highlight how government policy responds to the challenges and opportunities presented by the UK climate targets. The findings show widespread agreement that the UK energy system will become more electrified and decentralized as it incorporates more renewable energy. However the role of gaseous fuels in the energy system is more uncertain with some experts seeing a move from natural gas to hydrogen as being key to maintaining the security of supply while others see little or no role for hydrogen. There is also widespread agreement that the regulatory structure should change to address the challenges facing energy networks with much less agreement on whether this could happen quickly enough. Recent developments indicate the UK Government recognizes the need for regulatory change but it is premature to foresee their success in helping networks be a driver of rather than a barrier to a net-zero energy system.

As the need for sustainable hydrogen storage solutions increases enhancing the bonding interface between polymer liners and carbon fiber-reinforced polymer (CFRP) in Type IV hydrogen tanks is essential to ensure tank integrity and safety. This study investigates the effect of plasma treatment on polyethylene (PE) and PE/graphene nanoplatelets (GNP) composites to optimize bonding with CFRP simulating the liner-CFRP interface in hydrogen tanks. Initially plasma treatment effects on PE surfaces were assessed focusing on plasma energy and exposure time with key surface modifications characterized and bonding performance being evaluated. Plasma treatment on PE/GNP composites with increasing GNP content was then examined comparing the bonding effectiveness of untreated and plasma-treated samples. Wedge peel tests revealed that plasma treatment significantly enhanced PE-CFRP bonding with optimal conditions at 510 W and 180 s resulting in 212 % and 165 % increases in the wedge peel strength and fracture energy respectively. Plasma-treated PE/GNP composites with 0.75 wt.% GNP achieved a notable bonding enhancement with CFRP showing 528 % and 269 % improvements in strength and fracture energy over untreated neat PE-CFRP samples. These findings offer practical implications for improving the mechanical performance of hydrogen storage tanks contributing to safer and more efficient hydrogen storage systems for a sustainable energy future.

Green hydrogen and ammonia are forecast to play key roles in the deep decarbonization of the global economy. Here we explore the potential of using green hydrogen and ammonia to couple the energy agriculture and industrial sectors with India’s nationalscale electricity grid. India is an ideal test case as it currently has one of the most ambitious hydrogen programs in the world with projected electricity demands for hydrogen and ammonia production accounting for over 1500 TWh/yr or nearly 25% of India’s total electricity demand by 2050. We model the ambitious deep decarbonization of India’s electricity grid and half of its steel and fertilizer industries by 2050. We uncover modest risks for India from such a strategy with many benefits and opportunities. Our analysis suggests that a renewables-based energy system coupled with ammonia off-take sectors has the potential to dramatically reduce India’s greenhouse emissions reduce requirements for expensive long-duration energy storage or firm generating capacity reduce the curtailment of renewable energy provide valuable short-duration and long-duration load-shifting and system resilience to inter-annual weather variations and replace tens of billions of USD in ammonia and fuel imports each year. All this while potentially powering new multi-billion USD green steel and maritime fuel export industries. The key risk for India in relation to such a strategy lies in the potential for higher costs and reduced benefits if the rest of the world does not match their ambitious investment in renewables electrolyzers and clean storage technologies. We show that such a pessimistic outcome could result in the costs of green hydrogen and ammonia staying high for India through 2050 although still within the range of their gray counterparts. If on the other hand renewable and storage costs continue to decline further with continued global deployment all the above benefits could be achieved with a reduced levelized cost of hydrogen and ammonia (10–25%) potentially with a modest reduction in total energy system costs (5%). Such an outcome would have profound global implications given India’s central role in the future global energy economy establishing India’s global leadership in green shipping fuel agriculture and steel while creating an affordable sustainable and secure domestic energy supply.

The power to weight ratio of power plants is an important consideration especially in the design of Unmanned Aircraft System (UAS). In this paper a UAS with an MTOW of 35.3 kg equipped with a fuel cell as a prime power supply to provide electrical power to the propulsion system is considered. A pressure vessel design that can estimate and determine the total size and weight of the combined power plant of a fuel cell stack with hydrogen and air/oxygen vessels and the propulsion system of the UAS for highaltitude operation is proposed. Two scenarios are adopted to determine the size and weight of the pressure vessels required to supply oxygen to the fuel cell stack. Different types of stainless-steel materials are used in the design of the pressure vessel in order to find an appropriate material that provides low size and weight advantages. Also the design of a hydrogen pressure vessel and mass estimation are also considered. The estimated sizes and weights of the hydrogen and oxygen vessels of the power plant and propulsion system in this research offer a maximum of four hours of flying time for the UAS mission; this is based on a Horizon (H-1000) Proton Exchange Membrane (PEM) stack.

Located in the Arabian Gulf Kuwait is a renewable-abundant country ideal for producing hydrogen via solar energy (green hydrogen). With a global transition away from fossil fuels underway due to their adverse environmental impacts hydrogen is gaining significant traction as a promising clean energy alternative for the transport sector. Despite this there are still various challenges associated with implementing a hydrogen supply chain particularly with regard to the conflicting objectives of minimising cost environmental impact and risk. This study determines the feasibility of implementing a green hydrogen supply chain in Kuwait based on a multiobjective design to determine which combination of production (electrolysis type) storage method and transportation method is the most optimal for Kuwait. Three objective functions were considered in this study: the hydrogen supply chain cost environmental impact and safety/risk. A mathematical formulation based on mixed integer linear programming (MILP) was used involving a multi-criteria approach where the three considered objectives must be optimised simultaneously i.e. cost global warming potential and safety/risk. The multiobjective optimisation approach via the weighted sum method was applied in this study and solved via GAMS. To account for the ranking of multi-objective criteria a hybrid AHP-TOPSIS approach was used. Results showed that medium and high demand scenarios better reflect the comparative advantages of each considered method in terms of their multi-objective trade-offs. In particular it was found that higher hydrogen demand amplifies the impact of higher efficiency and operational savings within several production storage and transportation methods and that despite higher initial capital investments these costs are at some point offset by superior operational efficiency as hydrogen production volumes increase. Conversely using highly efficient electrolysers or transportation methods at low demand was found to limit their performance.

The reliance on hydrogen as part of the transition towards a low-carbon economy will require developing dedicated pipeline infrastructure. This deployment will be shaped by regulatory frameworks governing investment and access conditions ultimately structuring how the commodity is traded. The paper assesses the market design for hydrogen infrastructure assuming the application of unbundling requirements. For this purpose it develops a general economic framework for regulating pipeline infrastructure focusing on asset specificity market power and access rules. The paper assesses the scope of application of infrastructure regulation which can be set to individual pipelines or to entire networks. When treated as entire networks the infrastructure can provide flexibility to enhance market liquidity. However this requires establishing network monopolies which rely on central planning and reduce the overall dynamic efficiency of the sector. The paper further compares the regulation applied to US and EU natural gas pipeline infrastructure. Based on the different challenges faced by the EU hydrogen sector including absence of wholesale concentration and large infrastructure needs the paper draws lessons for a regulatory framework establishing the main building blocks of a hydrogen target model. The paper recommends a review of the current EU regulatory framework in the Hydrogen and Decarbonised Gas Package to enable i) the application of regulation to individual pipelines rather than entire networks; ii) the use of negotiated third-party access light-touch regulation and possibly marketbased coordination mechanisms for the access to the infrastructure and iii) a more significant role for long-term capacity contracts to underpin infrastructure investments.