Safety

This paper presents a compilation and discussion of the results supplied by HySafe partners participating in the Standard Benchmark Exercise Problem (SBEP) V1 which is based on an experiment on hydrogen release mixing and distribution inside a vessel. Each partner has his own point of view of the problem and uses a different approach to the solution. The main characteristics of the models employed for the calculations are compared. The comparison between results together with the experimental data when available is made. Relative deviations of each model from the experimental values are also included. Explanations and interpretations of the results are presented together with some useful conclusions for future work.

Hydrogen fuel cell vehicles are expected to come into widespread use in the near future. Accordingly many hydrogen carrying vehicles will begin to pass through tunnels. It is therefore important to predict whether risk from leaked hydrogen accidents in tunnels can be avoided. CFD simulation was carried out on diffusion  of leaked hydrogen in tunnels. Three areas of tunnels were chosen for study. One is the typical longitudinal and lateral areas of tunnels and the others are underground ventilation facilities and electrostatic dust collectors which were simulated with an actual tunnel. The amount of hydrogen leaked was 60m3 (approximately 5.08 kg) which corresponds to the amount necessary for future fuel cell vehicles to achieve their desired running distance. Analytical periods were the time after leaks began until regions of hydrogen above the low flammability limit had almost disappeared or thirty minutes. We found that leaked hydrogen is immediately carried away from leaking area under existing ventilation conditions. We also obtained basic data on behaviour of leaked hydrogen.

Flame acceleration and deflagration to detonation transition (DDT) is simulated with a numerical code based on a flux limiter centred method for hyperbolic differential equations. The energy source term is calculated by a Riemann solver for the in homogeneous Euler equations for the turbulent combustion and a two-step reaction model for hydrogen-air. The transport equations are filtered for large eddy simulation (LES) and the sub filter turbulence is modelled by a transport equation for the the turbulent kinetic energy. The flame tracking is handled by the G-equation for turbulent flames. Numerical results are compared to pressure histories from physical experiments. These experiments are performed in a closed circular 4m long tube with inner diameter of 0.107m. The tube is filled with hydrogen-air mixture at 1atm which is at rest when ignited. The ignition is located at one end of the tube. The tube is fitted with an obstruction with circular opening 1m down the tube from the ignition point. The obstruction has a blockage ratio of 0.92 and a thickness of 0.01m. The obstruction creates high pressures in the ignition end of the tube and very high gas velocities in and behind the obstruction opening. The flame experiences a detonation to deflagration transition (DDT) in the super sonic jet created by the obstruction. Pressure build-up in the ignition end of the tube is simulated with some discrepancies. The DDT in the supersonic jet is simulated but the position of the DDT is strongly dependent on the simulated pressure in the ignition end.

The method of the numerical solution of a three-dimensional problem of atmospheric release dispersion and explosion of gaseous admixtures is presented. It can be equally applied for gases of different densities including hydrogen. The system of simplified Navie-Stocks equations received by truncation of viscous members (Euler equations with source members) is used to obtain a numerical solution. The algorithm is based on explicit finite-difference Godunov scheme of arbitrary parameters breakup disintegration. To verify the developed model and computer system comparisons of numerical calculations with the published experimental data on the dispersion of methane and hydrocarbons explosions have been carried out. Computational experiments on evaporation and dispersion of spilled liquid hydrogen and released gaseous hydrogen at different wind speeds have been conducted. The largest mass concentrations of hydrogen between the bottom and top limits of flame propagation and cloud borders have been determined. The problem of the explosion of a hydrogen-air cloud of the complex form generated by large-scale spillage of liquid hydrogen and instant release of gaseous hydrogen has been numerically solved at low wind speed. Shock-wave loadings affecting the buildings located on a distance of 52 m from a hydrogen release place have been shown.

In order to facilitate the introduction of a new technology as it is the utilization of hydrogen as an energy carrier development of safety codes and standards besides the conduction of demonstrative projects becomes a very important action to be realized. Useful tools of work could be the existing gaseous fuel codes (natural gas and propane) regulating the stationary and automotive applications. Some safety codes have been updated to include hydrogen but they have been based on criteria and/or data applicable for large industrial facilities making the realization of public hydrogen infrastructures prohibitive in terms of space. In order to solve the above mentioned problems others questions come out: how these safety distances have been defined? Which hazard events have been taken as reference for calculation? Is it possible to reduce the safety distances through an appropriate design of systems and components or through the predisposition of adequate mitigation measures? This paper presents an analysis of the definitions of “safety distances” and “hazardous locations” as well as a synoptic analysis of the different values in force in several States for hydrogen and natural gas. The above mentioned synoptic table will highlight the lacks and so some fields that need to be investigated in order to produce a suitable hydrogen standard.

The development and promulgation of codes and standards are essential to establish a market-receptive environment for commercial hydrogen-based products and systems. The focus of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) is to conduct the research and development (R&D) needed to strengthen the scientific basis for technical requirements incorporated in national and international standards codes and regulations. In the U.S. the DOE and its industry partners have formed a Codes and Standards Tech Team (CSTT) to help guide the R&D. The CSTT has adopted an R&D Roadmap to achieve a substantial and verified database of the properties and behaviour of hydrogen and the performance characteristics of emerging hydrogen technology applications sufficient to enable the development of effective codes and standards for these applications. However to develop a more structured approach to the R&D described above the CSTT conducted a workshop on Risk Assessment for Hydrogen Codes and Standards in March 2005. The purpose of the workshop was to attain a consensus among invited experts on the protocols and data needed to address the development of risk-informed standards codes and regulations for hydrogen used as an energy carrier by consumers. Participants at the workshop identified and assessed requirements methodologies and applicability of risk assessment (RA) tools to develop a framework to conduct RA activities to address for example hydrogen fuel distribution delivery on-site storage and dispensing and hydrogen vehicle servicing and parking. The CSTT was particularly interested in obtaining the advice of RA experts and representatives of standards and model code developing organizations and industry on how data generated by R&D can be turned into information that is suitable for hydrogen codes and standards development. The paper reports on the results of the workshop and the RA activities that the DOE’s program on hydrogen safety codes and standards will undertake. These RA activities will help structure a comprehensive R&D effort that the DOE and its industry partners are undertaking to obtain the data and conduct the analysis and testing needed to establish a scientific and technical basis for hydrogen standards codes and regulations.

Reliable and effective sensors for the accurate detection of hydrogen concentrations in air are essential for the safe operation of fuel cells hydrogen fuelled systems (e.g. vehicles) and hydrogen production distribution and storage facilities. The present paper describes the activity on-going at JRC for the establishment of a facility that can be used for testing and validating the performance of hydrogen sensors under a range of conditions representative of those to be encountered in service. Potential aspects to be investigated in relation to the sensors performances are the influence of temperature humidity and pressure (simulating variations in altitude) the sensitivity to target gas and the cross sensitivity to other gases/vapours the reaction and recovery time and the sensors’ lifetime. The facility set up at JRC for the execution of these tests is described including the program for its commissioning. The results of a preliminary test are presented and discussed as an example.

This paper presents an analysis of computational fluid dynamic models of compressed hydrogen gas leaks into the air under different conditions to determine the volume of the hydrogen/air mixture and the extents of the lower flammable limit. The necessary hole size was calculated to determine a reasonably expected hydrogen leak rate from a valve or a fitting of 5 and 20 cfm under 400 bars resulting in a 0.1 and 0.2 mm effective diameter hole respectively. The results were compared to calculated hypothetical volumes from IEC 60079-10 for the same mass flowrate and in most cases the CFD results produced significantly smaller hydrogen/air volumes than the IEC standard. Prescriptive electrical classification distances in existing standards for hydrogen and compressed natural gas were examined but they do not consider storage pressure and there appears to be no scientific basis for the distance determination. A proposed table of electrical classification distances incorporating hydrogen storage volume and pressure was produced based on the hydrogen LFL extents from a 0.2 mm diameter hole and the requirements of existing standards. The PHOENICS CFD software package was used to solve the continuity momentum and concentration equations with the appropriate boundary conditions buoyancy model and turbulence models. Numerical results on hydrogen concentration predictions were obtained in the real industrial environment typical for a hydrogen refuelling or energy station.<br/><br/>

The large eddy simulation (LES) model developed at the University of Ulster has been applied to simulate releases of 5.11 m3 liquefied hydrogen (LH2) in open atmosphere and gaseous hydrogen (GH2) in 20-m3 closed vessel. The simulations of a spill of liquefied hydrogen confirmed the advantage of LES application to reproduce experimentally observed eddy structure of hydrogen-air cloud. The inclination angle of simulated cloud is close to experimentally reported 300. The processes of two phase hydrogen release and heat transfer were simplified by inflow of gaseous hydrogen with temperature 20 K equal to boiling point. It is shown that difference in inflow conditions geometry and grid resolution affects simulation results. It is suggested that phenomenon of air condensationevaporation in the cloud in temperature range 20-90 K should be accounted for in future. The simulations reproduced well experimental data on GH2 release and transport in 20-m3 vessel during 250 min including a phenomenon of hydrogen concentration growth at the bottom of the vessel. Higher experimental hydrogen concentration at the bottom is assumed to be due to non-uniformity of temperature of vessel walls generating additional convection. The comparison of convective and diffusion terms in Navie-Stokes equations has revealed that a value of convective term is more than order of magnitude prevail over a value of turbulent diffusion term. It is assumed that the hydrogen transport to the bottom of the vessel is driven by the remaining chaotic flow velocities superimposed on stratified hydrogen concentration field. Further experiments and simulations with higher accuracy have to be performed to confirm this phenomenon. It has been demonstrated that hydrogen-air mixture became stratified in about 1 min after release was completed. However one-dimensional models are seen not capable to reproduce slow transport of hydrogen during long period of time characteristic for scenarios such as leakage in a garage.

The FLACS CFD-tool for consequence prediction has been developed continuously since 1980. The initial focus was explosion safety on offshore oil platforms in recent years the tool is also applied to study dispersion hydrogen safety dust explosions and more. A development project sponsored by Norsk Hydro Statoil and Ishikawajima Heavy Industries (IHI) was carried out to improve the modelling and validation of hydrogen dispersion and explosions. In this project GexCon carried out 200 small-scale experiments on dispersion and explosion with H₂ and mixtures with H₂ and CO or N₂. Experiments with varying confinement congestion concentration and ignition location were performed. Since the main purpose of the tests was to produce good validation data all tests were simulated with the FLACS-HYDROGEN tool. The simulations confirmed the ability to predict explosions effects for the wide range of scenarios studied. A few examples of comparisons will be shown. To build confidence in a consequence prediction model it is important that the scales used for validation are as close as possible to reality. Since the hazard to people and facilities and the risk will generally increase with scale validation against large-scale experiments is important. In the 1980s a series of large-scale explosion experiments with H2 was carried out in the Sandia FLAME facility and sponsored by the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission. The FLAME facility is a 30.5m x 1.83m x 2.44m channel tests were performed with H2 concentrations from 7% to 30% with varying degree of top venting (0% 13% and 50%) and congestion (with or without baffles blocking 33% of the channel cross-section). A wide range of flame speeds and overpressures were observed. Comparisons are made between FLACS simulations and FLAME tests. The main conclusion from this validation study is that the precision when predicting H2 explosion consequences with FLACS has been improved to a very acceptable level