Regulations, Codes & Standards (RCS)

The European Strategy Forum on Research Infrastructures (ESFRI) recognizes in its roadmap for Research Infrastructures that ?in the near future hydrogen as an energy carrier derived from various other fuels and fuel cells as energy transformers are expected to come into a major role for mobility but also for different other mobile and stationary applications? |1|. This modern hydrogen driven society lags far behind the reality. Because of that it is conform to question the current situation concerning the belief that already most is comprehensively investigated and developed concerning hydrogen technology is correct and already done. From that it appears the hydrogen technology is market ready only partial and not prepared in a sufficient way to get finally included and adopted in modern hydrogen driven society and especially the acceptance of the society is a critical. Beside this critical view through society several scientific and technical bottlenecks still discoverable. Nevertheless it is possible to foster furthermore science and development on hydrogen technology. The ?Integrating European Infrastructure? was created to support science and development of hydrogen and fuel cell technologies towards European strategy for sustainable competitive and secure energy also while identifying scientific and technical bottlenecks to support solutions based on. Its acronym is H2FC European Infrastructure and was formed to integrate the European R&D community around rare and/or unique infrastructural elements that will facilitate and significantly enhance the research and development of hydrogen and fuel cell technology.

The development and promulgation of codes and standards are essential to establish a market-receptive environment for commercial hydrogen-based products and systems. The focus of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) is to conduct the research and development (R&D) needed to strengthen the scientific basis for technical requirements incorporated in national and international standards codes and regulations. In the U.S. the DOE and its industry partners have formed a Codes and Standards Tech Team (CSTT) to help guide the R&D. The CSTT has adopted an R&D Roadmap to achieve a substantial and verified database of the properties and behaviour of hydrogen and the performance characteristics of emerging hydrogen technology applications sufficient to enable the development of effective codes and standards for these applications. However to develop a more structured approach to the R&D described above the CSTT conducted a workshop on Risk Assessment for Hydrogen Codes and Standards in March 2005. The purpose of the workshop was to attain a consensus among invited experts on the protocols and data needed to address the development of risk-informed standards codes and regulations for hydrogen used as an energy carrier by consumers. Participants at the workshop identified and assessed requirements methodologies and applicability of risk assessment (RA) tools to develop a framework to conduct RA activities to address for example hydrogen fuel distribution delivery on-site storage and dispensing and hydrogen vehicle servicing and parking. The CSTT was particularly interested in obtaining the advice of RA experts and representatives of standards and model code developing organizations and industry on how data generated by R&D can be turned into information that is suitable for hydrogen codes and standards development. The paper reports on the results of the workshop and the RA activities that the DOE’s program on hydrogen safety codes and standards will undertake. These RA activities will help structure a comprehensive R&D effort that the DOE and its industry partners are undertaking to obtain the data and conduct the analysis and testing needed to establish a scientific and technical basis for hydrogen standards codes and regulations.

The permitting process for hydrogen fueling stations varies from country to country. However a common step in the permitting process is the demonstration that the proposed fueling station meets certain safety requirements. Currently many permitting authorities rely on compliance with well known codes and standards as a means to permit a facility. Current codes and standards for hydrogen facilities require certain safety features specify equipment made of material suitable for hydrogen environment and include separation or safety distances. Thus compliance with the code and standard requirements is widely accepted as evidence of a safe design. However to ensure that a hydrogen facility is indeed safe the code and standard requirements should be identified using a risk-informed process that utilizes an acceptable level of risk. When compliance with one or more code or standard requirements is not possible an evaluation of the risk associated with the exemptions to the requirements should be understood and conveyed to the Authority Having Jurisdiction (AHJ). Establishment of a consistent risk assessment toolset and associated data is essential to performing these risk evaluations. This paper describes an approach for risk-informing the permitting process for hydrogen fueling stations that relies primarily on the establishment of risk-informed codes and standards. The proposed risk-informed process begins with the establishment of acceptable risk criteria associated with the operation of hydrogen fueling stations. Using accepted Quantitative Risk Assessment (QRA) techniques and the established risk criteria the minimum code and standard requirements necessary to ensure the safe operation of hydrogen facilities can be identified. Risk informed permitting processes exist in some countries and are being developed in others. To facilitate consistent risk-informed approaches the participants in the International Energy Agency (IEA) Task 19 on hydrogen safety are working to identify acceptable risk criteria QRA models and supporting data.

According to European Directive 2014/94/EU hydrogen providers have the responsibility to prove that their hydrogen is of suitable quality for fuel cell vehicles. Contaminants may originate from hydrogen production transportation refuelling station or maintenance operation. This study investigated the probability of presence of the 13 gaseous contaminants (ISO 14687-2) in hydrogen on 3 production processes: steam methane reforming (SMR) process with pressure swing adsorption (PSA) chlor-alkali membrane electrolysis process and water proton exchange membrane electrolysis process with temperature swing adsorption. The rationale behind the probability of contaminant presence according to process knowledge and existing barriers is highlighted. No contaminant was identified as possible or frequent for the three production processes except oxygen (frequent for chlor-alkali membrane process) carbon monoxide (frequent) and nitrogen (possible) for SMR with PSA. Based on it a hydrogen quality assurance plan following ISO 19880-8 can be devised to support hydrogen providers in monitoring the relevant contaminants.

The aim of this project was to review the current purge standards for UK domestic installations in particular IGEM/UP/1B and carry out experiments to assess the validity of those standards for use in hydrogen in order to understand and recommend safe purge practices for hydrogen in a domestic environment.

This report provides the results and conclusions relating to the relative safety of purging domestic installations to hydrogen compared to Natural Gas and the implications of releasing any purged gas

into an enclosed volume representing a small room.

The two high-level findings from this work are:

• changeover to hydrogen will result in an increased risk of flammability inside the installation pipework
• changeover to hydrogen will result in a reduced risk of a build-up of flammable gas in any room where purging occurs.

This work recognises a number of important differences between hydrogen and methane. Hydrogen is more flammable than methane in air particularly at high concentrations. Hydrogen can maintain a flame at 4% but does not support general three dimensional deflagration until about 8.5%. Above about 18% given increased obstruction within the combustion zone or passage of the flame along a pipe the deflagration can transition to detonation. The flame speed suddenly increases to ~2000m/s. It is very important to avoid this situation although the inventory in a domestic pipe is low. This risk of detonation can occur at concentrations up to 59% and the risk of deflagration remains to 75 %.Methane behaves very differently to this with a range of deflagration of about 4.8 to 16% and a detonation range only marginally narrower. Initiating detonation is however much more difficult with methane.

The risks with hydrogen are associated with a wide range of flammability with methane the risks are smaller and mainly in lower concentrations of gas in air. Because of this it is particularly important to ensure hydrogen pipes are appropriately purged.

Automated and electric mass transit will play a significant role in the connectivity of our cities and regions. But automated mass transit must be placed within the wider context of the optimum transport needs of those cities and regions— transport networks based on shared and multi-modal mobility. Realising the full potential of these networks will require sustained policy development and investment.<br/>This report examines current and future developments in the use of automation and new energy sources in land-based mass transit including rail and road mass transit point-to-point transport using automated vehicles and the role and responsibilities of the Commonwealth in the development of these technologies. It will analyse the opportunities and challenges presented by automation and new energy sources and the role the Australian Government has to play in managing this transport revolution.

The HYPER project a specific targeted research project (STREP) funded by the European Commission under the Sixth Framework Programme developed an Installation Permitting Guide (IPG) for hydrogen and fuel cell stationary applications. The IPG was developed in response to the growing need for guidance to foster the use and facilitate installation of these systems in Europe. This document presents a modified version of the IPG specifically intended for the UK market. For example reference is made to UK national regulations standards and practices when appropriate as opposed to European ones.<br/>The IPG applies to stationary systems fuelled by hydrogen incorporating fuel cell devices with net electrical output of up to 10 kWel and with total power outputs of the order of 50 kW (combined heat + electrical) suitable for small back up power supplies residential heating combined heat-power (CHP) and small storage systems. Many of the guidelines appropriate for these small systems will also apply to systems up to 100 kWel which will serve small communities or groups of households. The document is not a standard but is a compendium of useful information for a variety of users with a role in installing these systems including design engineers manufacturers architects installers operators/maintenance workers and regulators.<br/>This report and the work it describes were funded by the Health and Safety Executive (HSE). Its contents including any opinions and/or conclusions expressed are those of the authors alone and do not necessarily reflect HSE policy.

This study has developed traceable standards for evaluating impurities in hydrogen fuel according to ISO 14687. Impurities in raw H2 including sub mmol/mol levels of CO CO2 and CH4 were analyzed using multiple detectors while avoiding contamination. The gravimetric standards prepared included mixtures of the following nominal concentrations: 1 2 3e5 8e11 17e23 and 47e65 mmol/mol for CO2 CH4 and CO O2 N2 Ar and He respectively. The expanded uncertainty ranges were 0.8% for Ar N2 and He 1% for CH4 and CO and 2% for CO2 and O2. These standards were stable while that for CO varied by only 0.5% during a time span of three years. The prepared standards are useful for evaluating the compliance of H2 fuel in service stations with ISO 14687 quality requirements.

IGEM/TD/13 Standard applies to the safe design construction inspection testing operation and maintenance of pressure regulating installations (PRIs) in accordance with current knowledge and operational experience.

This Supplement provides additional requirements for new PRIs to be used for the transmission of Hydrogen including Natural Gas/Hydrogen blended mixtures (subsequently referred to as NG/H blends) and for the repurposing of Natural Gas (NG) PRIs for Hydrogen service.

NG/H blends are considered to be equivalent to 100 mol % Hydrogen with respect to limits on design stresses the potential effect on the material properties and damage and defect categories and acceptance levels unless an additional technical evaluation is carried out to qualify the materials.

NG/H blends containing in excess of 10 mol % Hydrogen are considered to be equivalent to 100 mol.% Hydrogen with respect to all other requirements except for hazardous areas.

This Supplement gives additional recommendations for PRIs and installations

• with an upstream maximum operating pressure (MOP) not greater than 100 bar
• with an outlet pressure greater than or equal to 7 bar
• for use with Hydrogen or NG/H blends with a Hydrogen content greater than 10 %
• operating with a temperature range between -20°C and 120°C.

You can purchase the standard here

"Hydrogen is expected to play a critical role in the move to a net-zero economy. However large-scale deployment is still in its infancy and there is still much to be done before we can blend hydrogen in large volumes into gas networks and ramp up the production that is required to meet demands of the energy transport and industry sectors. KTN Global Alliance will host two webinars to explore these challenges and opportunities in hydrogen blending on the 2nd and 3rd March 2021.



Exciting pilot projects are being conducted and explored in the UK Canada and US states such as California to determine the technical feasibility of blending hydrogen into existing natural gas systems. Whilst the deployment of hydrogen is in its early stages there is increasing interest around permitting significant percentage blends of hydrogen into gas networks which would enable the carbon intensity of gas supplies to be reduced creating a new demand for hydrogen and with the use of separation and purification technologies downstream support the transportation of pure hydrogen to markets.

Gaps in codes and standards need to be addressed to enable adoption and there may be opportunities for international collaboration and harmonisation to ensure that best practices are shared globally and to facilitate the growth of trade and export markets. There is an opportunity for the UK Canada and US three G7 countries to work together and show market making leadership in key enabling regulation for the new hydrogen economy.



Delivered by KTN Global Alliance on behalf of the British Consulate-General in Vancouver and the UK Science and Innovation Network in Canada and the US these two webinars will showcase hydrogen blending pilot projects in the UK Canada and California highlighting challenges and opportunities with regard to standards development for hydrogen blending and supporting further transatlantic collaboration in this area. The events also form part of the UK’s international engagement to build momentum towards a successful outcome at COP26 the UN climate summit that the UK will host in Glasgow in November 2021. The webinars will bring together experts from industry academia and policy from the UK Canada and California. Attendees will have an opportunity to ask questions and interact using Mentimeter."











Part 2 Highlights and Perspectives from Canada and California can be found here.