United Kingdom

This paper investigated the opportunities and challenges of integrating ports into hydrogen (H2 ) supply chains in the context of Australia and Japan because they are leading countries in the field and are potential leaders in the upcoming large-scale H2 trade. Qualitative interviews were conducted in the two countries to identify opportunities for H2 ports necessary infrastructure and facilities key factors for operations and challenges associated with the ports’ development followed by an online survey investigating the readiness levels of H2 export and import ports. The findings reveal that there are significant opportunities for both countries’ H2 ports and their respective regions which encompass business transition processes and decarbonisation. However the ports face challenges in areas including infrastructure training standards and social licence and the sufficiency and readiness levels of port infrastructure and other critical factors are low. Recommendations were proposed to address the challenges and barriers encountered by H2 ports. To optimise logistics operations within H2 ports and facilitate effective integration of H2 applications this paper developed a user-oriented working process framework to provide guidance to ports seeking to engage in the H2 economy. Its findings and recommendations contribute to filling the existing knowledge gap pertaining to H2 ports.

Low-cost green hydrogen production will be key in reaching net zero carbon emissions by 2050. Green hydrogen can be produced by electrolysis using renewable energy including wind energy. However the configuration of offshore wind-to-hydrogen systems is not yet standardised. For example electrolysis can take place onshore or offshore. This work presents a framework to assess and quantify which configuration is more resilient so that security of hydrogen supply is incorporated in strategic decisions with the following key findings. First resilience should be assessed according to hydrogen supply rather than hydrogen production. This allows the framework to be applicable for all identified system configurations. Second resilience can be quantified according to the quantity ratio and lost revenue of the unsupplied hydrogen.

Hydrogen is one of the key solutions to decarbonising the UK economy along with other carbon abatement solutions such as electrification CCUS biofuels and energy efficiency. It provides a low carbon alternative to fossil fuels that has many of the same desirable features such as burning with a high temperature flame without producing carbon emissions during combustion. Hydrogen will be particularly valuable in hard-to-decarbonise sectors that have few cost-effective alternatives including elements of industry heavy transport and dispatchable power generation. However it’s use could be much more widespread depending on how costs preferences and policy for different low carbon solutions develop. The Government’s Hydrogen Strategy estimates that based on analysis from the Climate Change Committee (CCC) in 2050 between 20% and 35% of the UK’s final energy demand could be met with low carbon hydrogen1 . While hydrogen provides a promising solution to reducing emissions current deployment of low carbon hydrogen is low with almost all hydrogen in the UK produced from unabated fossil fuels resulting in high emissions. In the UK hydrogen production must meet the Low Carbon Hydrogen Standard (LCHS) to access government support. This is currently set at 20g CO2 e/MJ(LHV) and will ensure that future deployment will deliver significant emissions reductions when switching from fossil fuels2. The period to 2030 will be a critical time for the UK to seize the economic opportunity presented by low carbon hydrogen sector. Internationally increasing attention has been placed on hydrogen as a solution to global emissions. In the USA the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) has provided fixed rate tax credits of up to $3/kg (£2.4/kgII) for clean hydrogen production3. Closer to home the EU is targeting 10 million tonnes of domestic electrolytic production and an additional 10 million tonnes of electrolytic hydrogen imports by 20304. This will be achieved through a variety of policy levers including an auction for fixed price subsidy support for electrolytic production with a ceiling of €4.5/kg5 (£3.84/kgIII). In the UK Government have set an ambitious target of up to 10 GW of low carbon hydrogen production by 2030 with at least half of this from electrolytic sources6. This will be supported by the Hydrogen Production Business Model (HPBM) a two-way variable CfD which could potentially provide hydrogen for a price as low as the natural gas price7 . As global supply chains investment and skills are in international competition the UK must continue its ambitious hydrogen aspirations to ensure the decarbonisation and economic opportunity presented by low carbon hydrogen is captured. This study estimates the economic impact of the low carbon hydrogen sector in the UK by 2030. The impact is assessed by estimating the costs of hydrogen deployment and applying employment and GVA multipliers to these costs based on historic economic activity. These estimates are broken down by different forms of low carbon hydrogen production and end use as well as the enabling infrastructure required to connect production and demand namely hydrogen networks and storage. Both the employment and GVA are estimated for each of these value chain elements for every year between 2024 and 2030. Employment and economic growth from the hydrogen sector will be created across the UK with many benefits arising in regions that have faced historic underinvestment such as the industrial clusters and Scotland. Beyond the high-level economic benefits estimated in this study the hydrogen sector creates an opportunity for the hundreds of thousands oil and gas sector jobs in the UK to transition to a low carbon alternative.

This report can be found on Hydrogen UK's website.

A growing share of renewable energy production in the energy supply systems is key to reaching the European political goal of zero CO2 emission in 2050 highlighted in the green deal. Linked to the irregular production of solar and wind energies which have the highest potential for development in Europe massive energy storage solutions are needed as energy buffers. The European project HyPSTER [1] (Hydrogen Pilot STorage for large Ecosystem Replication) granted by the Clean Hydrogen Partnership addresses this topic by demonstrating a cyclic test in an experimental salt cavern filled with hydrogen up to 3 tons using hydrogen that is produced onsite by a 1 MW electrolyser. One specific objective of the project is the assessment of the risks and environmental impacts of cyclic hydrogen storage in salt caverns and providing guidelines for safety regulations and standards. This paper highlights the first outcome of the task WP5.5 of the HyPSTER project addressing the regulatory and normative frameworks for the safety of hydrogen storage in salt caverns from some selected European Countries which is dedicated to defining recommendations for promoting the safe development of this industry within Europe.

Porous carbons have been extensively investigated for hydrogen storage but to date appear to have an upper limit to their storage capacity. Here in an effort to circumvent this upper limit we explore the potential of oxygen-rich activated carbons. We describe cellulose acetate-derived carbons that combine high surface area (3800 m2 g−1 ) and pore volume (1.8 cm3 g−1 ) that arise almost entirely (>90%) from micropores with an oxygen-rich nature. The carbons exhibit enhanced gravimetric hydrogen uptake (8.1 wt% total and 7.0 wt% excess) at −196 °C and 20 bar rising to a total uptake of 8.9 wt% at 30 bar and exceptional volumetric uptake of 44 g l −1 at 20 bar and 48 g l −1 at 30 bar. At room temperature they store up to 0.8 wt% (excess) and 1.2 wt% (total) hydrogen at only 30 bar and their isosteric heat of hydrogen adsorption is above 10 kJ mol−1 .

Underground coal gasification (UCG) is an emerging clean energy technology with significant potential for enhanced hydrogen production especially when coupled with water injection. Previous lab-scale studies have explored this potential but the mechanisms driving water-assisted hydrogen enhancement in large-scale deep UCG settings remain unclear. This study addresses this gap using numerical simulations of a large-scale deep coal model designed for hydrogen-oriented UCG. We investigated single-point and multipoint water injection stra tegies to optimize hydrogen production. Additionally we developed a retractable water injection technique to ensure sustained hydrogen output and effective cavity control. Our results indicate that the water–gas shift re action is crucial for increasing hydrogen production. Multipoint injection has been proven to be more effective than single-point injection increasing hydrogen production by 11% with an equal amount of steam. The introduction of retractable injection allows for continuous and efficient hydrogen generation with daily hydrogen production rates of approximately five times that of a conventional injection scheme and an increase in cumulative hydrogen production of approximately 105% over the same time period. Importantly the mul tipoint injection method also helped limit vertical cavity growth mitigating the risk of aquifer contamination. These findings support the potential of UCG as a low-carbon energy source in the transition to a hydrogen economy

Though being attractive on railway decarbonisation for regional lines excessive cost caused by immature hydrogen supply chain is one of the significant hurdles for promoting hydrogen traction to rolling stocks. Therefore we conduct bespoke research on the UK’s hydrogen supply chain for railway concentrating on hydrogen transportation. Firstly a map for the planned hydrogen production plants and potential hydrogen lines is developed with the location capacity and usage. A spatially explicit model for the hydrogen supply chain is then introduced which optimises the existing grid-based methodology on accuracy and applicability. Compressed hydrogen at three pressures and liquid hydrogen are considered as the mediums incorporating by road and rail transport. Furthermore three scenarios for hydrogen rail penetration are simulated respectively to discuss the levelised cost and the most suitable national transport network. The results show that the developed model with mix-integer linear programming (MILP) can well design the UK’s hydrogen distribution for railway traction. Moreover the hydrogen transport medium and vehicle should adjust to suit for different era where the penetration of hydrogen traction varies. The levelised cost of hydrogen (LCOH) decreases from 6.13 £/kg to 5.13 £/kg on average from the conservative scenario to the radical scenario. Applying different transport combinations according to the specific situation can satisfy the demand while reducing cost for multi-supplier and multitargeting hydrogen transport.

As global economies seek to transition to low-carbon energy systems to achieve net zero targets hydrogen has potential to play a key role to decarbonise sectors that are unsuited to electrification or where long-term energy storage is required. Hydrogen can also assist in enabling decentralized renewable power generation to satisfy higher electricity demand to match the scale-up of electrified technologies. In this context suitable transport storage and distribution networks will be essential to connect hydrogen generation and utilisation sites. This paper presents a techno-economic impact evaluation of international marine hydrogen transportation between Canada and the Netherlands comparing liquid hydrogen ammonia and a dibenzyl toluene liquid organic hydrogen carrier (LOHC) as potential transport vectors. Economic costs energy consumption and losses in each phase of the transportation system were analysed for each vector. Based on the devised scenarios our model suggests levelised costs of hydrogen of 6.35–9.49 $2022/kgH2 and pathway efficiencies of 55.6–71.9%. While liquid hydrogen was identified as the most cost-competitive carrier sensitivity analysis revealed a merit order for system optimisation strategies based upon which LOHC could outperform both liquid hydrogen and ammonia in the future.

Zero-emission fuels are expected to drive the maritime sector decarbonisation with hydrogen emerging as a long-term solution. This study aims to investigate by using CFD modelling a hydrogen fuelled marine dual-fuel engine to identify operating settings ranges for different hydrogen energy fractions (HEF) as well as parametrically optimise the diesel fuel injection timing and temperature at inlet valve closing (IVC). A large marine four-stroke engine with nominal power of 10.5 MW at 500 rev/m is considered assuming operation at 90 % load and hydrogen injection in the cylinders intake ports. CFD models are developed for several operating scenarios in both diesel and dual-fuel modes. The models are validated against measured data for the engine diesel mode and literature data for a hydrogen-fuelled light-duty engine. A convergence study is conducted to select the grid compromising between computational effort and accuracy. Parametric runs for 20 % 40 % and 60 % HEF with different IVC temperature and diesel start of injection are modelled to quantify the engine performance emissions and combustion characteristics. A single parameter optimisation is conducted to determine the most effective pilot diesel injection timings. The results reveal the IVC temperature range for stable hydrogen combustion to avoid incomplete combustion at low IVC temperature and knocking above 360 K. The proposed settings lead to higher peak heat release rate and in-cylinder pressure compared to the diesel mode without exceeding the permissible in-cylinder pressure rise limits for 60 % HEF. However NOx emissions increase to 12.9 g/kWh in the dual-fuel mode. The optimal start of injection (SOI) for the diesel fuel in the case of 60 % HEF is found 8 ◦CA BTDC resulting in an indicated thermal efficiency of 43.2 % and stable combustion. Advancing SOI beyond the optimal value results in incomplete combustion. This is the first study on hydrogen use in large marine four-stroke engines providing insights for the engine design and operation and as such it contributes to the maritime industry decarbonisation efforts.

Bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS) technology is expected to support net-zero targets by supplying low carbon energy while providing carbon dioxide removal (CDR). BECCS is estimated to deliver 20 to 70 MtCO2 annual negative emissions by 2050 in the UK despite there are currently no BECCS operating facility. This research is modelling and demonstrating the flexibility scalability and attainable immediate application of BECCS. The CDR potential for two out of three BECCS pathways considered by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) scenarios were quantified (i) modular-scale CHP process with post-combustion CCS utilising wheat straw and (ii) hydrogen production in a small-scale gasifier with pre-combustion CCS utilising locally sourced waste wood. Process modelling and lifecycle assessment were used including a whole supply chain analysis. The investigated BECCS pathways could annually remove between − 0.8 and − 1.4 tCO2e tbiomass− 1 depending on operational decisions. Using all the available wheat straw and waste wood in the UK a joint CDR capacity for both systems could reach about 23% of the UK’s CDR minimum target set for BECCS. Policy frameworks prioritising carbon efficiencies can shape those operational decisions and strongly impact on the overall energy and CDR performance of a BECCS system but not necessarily maximising the trade-offs between biomass use energy performance and CDR. A combination of different BECCS pathways will be necessary to reach net-zero targets. Decentralised BECCS deployment could support flexible approaches allowing to maximise positive system trade-offs enable regional biomass utilisation and provide local energy supply to remote areas.