Norway

One of the main benefits sought by including hydrogen in the alternative fuels mix is emissions reduction – eventually by 100%. However in the near term there is a very significant cost differential between fossil fuels and hydrogen. Hythane (a blend of hydrogen and natural gas) can act as a viable next step on the path to an ultimate hydrogen economy as a fuel blend consisting of 8−30 % hydrogen in methane can reduce emissions while not requiring significant changes in existing infrastructure. This work seeks to evaluate whether hythane may be safer than both hydrogen and methane under certain conditions. This is due to the fact hythane combines the positive safety properties of hydrogen (strong buoyancy high diffusivity) and methane (much lower flame speeds and narrower flammability limits as compared to hydrogen). For this purpose several different mixture compositions (e.g. 8 % 20 % and 30 % hydrogen) are considered. The evaluation of (a) dispersion characteristics (which are more positive than for methane) (b) combustion characteristics (which are closer to methane than hydrogen) and (c) Combined dispersion + explosion risk is performed. This risk is expected to be comparable to that of pure methane possibly lower in some situations and definitely lower than for pure hydrogen. The work is performed using the CFD software FLACS that has been well-validated for safety studies of both natural gas/methane and hydrogen systems. The first part of the work will involve validating the flame speeds and flammability limits predicted by FLACS against values available in literature. The next part of the work involves validating the overpressures predicted by the CFD tool for combustion of premixed mixtures of methane and hydrogen with air against available experimental data. In the end practical systems such as vehicular tunnels garages etc. is used to demonstrate positive safety benefits of hythane with comparisons to similar simulations for both hydrogen and methane.

This paper presents results from an experimental study of vented hydrogen deflagrations in 20-foot ISO containers. The scenarios investigated include 14 tests with explosion venting through the doors of the containers and 20 tests with venting through openings in the roof. The parameters investigated include hydrogen concentration vent area type of venting device and the level of congestion inside the containers. All tests involved homogeneous and initially quiescent hydrogen-air mixtures. The results demonstrate the strong effect of congestion on the maximum reduced explosion pressures which typically is not accounted for in current standards and guidelines for explosion protection. The work is a deliverable from work package 2 (WP2) in the project “Improving hydrogen safety for energy applications through pre-normative research on vented deflagrations” or HySEA which receives funding from the Fuel Cells and Hydrogen Joint Undertaking (FCH JU) under grant agreement no. 671461.

The future of hydrogen energy is wrapped up with the future of natural gas renewable energy and carbon capture and storage (CCS). This yields useful synergies but also political economic and technical complexity. Nevertheless our survey of more than 1000 senior oil and gas professionals suggests a more certain future for hydrogen and that the time is right to begin scaling the hydrogen economy.

This paper introduces the 3D risk management (3DRM) concept with particular emphasis on hydrogen installations (Hy3DRM). The 3DRM framework entails an integrated solution for risk management that combines a detailed site-specific 3D geometry model a computational fluid dynamics (CFD) tool for simulating flow-related accident scenarios methodology for frequency analysis and quantitative risk assessment (QRA) and state-of-the-art visualization techniques for risk communication and decision support. In order to reduce calculation time and to cover escalating accident scenarios involving structural collapse and projectiles the CFD-based consequence analysis can be complemented with empirical engineering models reduced order models or finite element analysis (FEA). The paper outlines the background for 3DRM and presents a proof-of-concept risk assessment for a hypothetical hydrogen filling station. The prototype focuses on dispersion fire and explosion scenarios resulting from loss of containment of gaseous hydrogen. The approach adopted here combines consequence assessments obtained with the CFD tool FLACS-Hydrogen from Gexcon and event frequencies estimated with the Hydrogen Risk Assessment Models (HyRAM) tool from Sandia to generate 3D risk contours for explosion pressure and radiation loads. For a given population density and set of harm criteria it is straightforward to extend the analysis to include personnel risk as well as risk-based design such as detector optimization. The discussion outlines main challenges and inherent limitations of the 3DRM concept as well as prospects for further development towards a fully integrated framework for risk management in organizations.

This paper describes a series of numerical simulations with release and ignition of hydrogen. The objective of this work was to re-investigate the accidental explosion in an ammonia plant which happened in Norway in 1985 with modern CFD tools. The severe hydrogen-air explosion led to two fatalities and complete destruction of the factory building where the explosion occurred. A case history of the accident was presented at the 1.st ICHS in Pisa 2005.<br/>The numerical simulations have been performed with FLACS a commercial CFD simulation tool for gas dispersion and gas explosions. The code has in the recent years been validated in the area of hydrogen dispersion and explosions.<br/>The factory building was 100 m long 10 m wide and 7 m high. A blown-out gasket in a water pump led to release of hydrogen from a large reservoir storing gaseous hydrogen at 3.0 MPa. The accident report estimated a total mass of released hydrogen between 10 and 20 kg. The location of the faulty gasket is known but the direction of the accidental release is not well known and has been one of the topics of our investigations. Several simulations have been performed to investigate the mixing process of hydrogen-air clouds and the development of a flammable gas cloud inside the factory building resulting in a simulation matrix with dispersions in all axis directions. Simulations of ignition of the different gas clouds were carried out and resulting pressure examined. These results have been compared with the damages observed during the accident investigation.<br/>We have also performed FLACS simulations to study the effect of natural venting and level of congestion. The height of the longitudinal walls has been varied leading to different vent openings at floor level at the ceiling and a combination of the two. This was done to investigate the effects of congestion with regards to gas cloud formation.<br/>The base case simulation appears to be in good accordance to the observed damages from the accident. The simulations also show that the build up of the gas cloud strongly depends on the direction of the jet and degree of ventilation. The CFD study has given new insights to the accident and the results are a clear reminder of the importance of natural venting in hydrogen safety.

The European Strategy Forum on Research Infrastructures (ESFRI) recognizes in its roadmap for Research Infrastructures that ?in the near future hydrogen as an energy carrier derived from various other fuels and fuel cells as energy transformers are expected to come into a major role for mobility but also for different other mobile and stationary applications? |1|. This modern hydrogen driven society lags far behind the reality. Because of that it is conform to question the current situation concerning the belief that already most is comprehensively investigated and developed concerning hydrogen technology is correct and already done. From that it appears the hydrogen technology is market ready only partial and not prepared in a sufficient way to get finally included and adopted in modern hydrogen driven society and especially the acceptance of the society is a critical. Beside this critical view through society several scientific and technical bottlenecks still discoverable. Nevertheless it is possible to foster furthermore science and development on hydrogen technology. The ?Integrating European Infrastructure? was created to support science and development of hydrogen and fuel cell technologies towards European strategy for sustainable competitive and secure energy also while identifying scientific and technical bottlenecks to support solutions based on. Its acronym is H2FC European Infrastructure and was formed to integrate the European R&D community around rare and/or unique infrastructural elements that will facilitate and significantly enhance the research and development of hydrogen and fuel cell technology.

Nomograms for assessment of hazard distances from a blast wave generated by a catastrophic rupture of stand-alone (stationary) and onboard compressed hydrogen cylinder in a fire are presented. The nomograms are easy to use hydrogen safety engineering tools. They were built using the validated and recently published analytical model. Two types of nomograms were developed – one for use by first responders and another for hydrogen safety engineers. The paper underlines the importance of an international effort to unify harm and damage criteria across different countries as the discrepancies identified by the authors gave the expected results of different hazard distances for different criteria.

The successful Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) benchmarking activity originally started within the EC-funded Network of Excellence HySafe (2004-2009) continues within the research topics of the recently established “International Association of Hydrogen Safety” (IA-HySafe). The present contribution reports the results of the standard benchmark problem SBEP-V21. Focus is given to hydrogen dispersion and accumulation within a non-ventilated ambient pressure garage both during the release and post-release periods but for very low release rates as compared to earlier work (SBEP-V3). The current experiments were performed by CEA at the GARAGE facility under highly controlled conditions. Helium was vertically released from the centre of the 5.76 m (length) x 2.96 m (width) x 2.42 m (height) facility 22 cm from the floor from a 29.7 mm diameter opening at a volumetric rate of 18 L/min (0.027 g/s equivalent hydrogen release rate compared to 1 g/s for SBEP-V3) and for a period of 3740 seconds. Helium concentrations were measured with 57 catharometric sensors at various locations for a period up to 1.1 days. The simulations were performed using a variety of CFD codes and turbulence models. The paper compares the results predicted by the participating partners and attempts to identify the reasons for any observed disagreements.

This paper describes a series of explosion experiments in inhomogeneous hydrogen air clouds in a standard 20′ ISO container. Test parameter variations included nozzle configuration jet direction reservoir back pressure time of ignition after release and degree of obstacles. The paper presents the experimental setup resulting pressure records and high speed videos. The explosion pressures from the experiments without obstacles were in the range of 0.4–7 kPa. In the experiments with obstacles the gas exploded more violently producing pressures in order of 100 kPa.

The different CFD tools used by the NoE HySafe partners are applied to a series of integral complex Standard Benchmark Exercise Problems (SBEPs). All benchmarks cover complementarily physical phenomena addressing application relevant scenarios and refer to associated experiments with an explicit usage of hydrogen. After the blind benchmark SBEPV1 and SBEPV3 with subsonic vertical release in a large vessel and in a garage like facility SBEPV4 with a horizontal under-expanded jet release through a small nozzle SBEPV5 covers the scenario of a subsonic horizontal jet release in a multi-compartment room.<br/>As the associated dispersion experiments conducted by GEXCON Norsk Hydro and STATOIL were disclosed to the participants the whole benchmark was conducted openly. For the purpose of validation only the low momentum test D27 had to be simulated.<br/>The experimental rig consists of a 1.20 m x 0.20 m x 0.90 m (Z vertical) vessel divided into 12 compartments partially even physically by four baffle plates. In each compartment a hydrogen concentration sensor is mounted. There is one vent opening at the wall opposite the release location centrally located about 1 cm above floor with dimensions 0.10 m (Y) times 0.20 m (Z). The first upper baffle plate close to the release point is on a sensitive location as it lies nearly perfectly in the centre of the buoyant jet and thus separates the flow into the two compartments. The actual release was a nominally constant flow of 1.15 norm liters for 60 seconds. With a 12mm nozzle diameter this corresponds to an average exit velocity of 10.17 m/s.<br/>6 CFD packages have been applied by 7 HySafe partners to simulate this experiment: ADREAHF by NCSRD FLACS by GexCon and DNV KFX by DNV FLUENT by UPM and UU CFX by HSE/HSL and GASFLOW by FZK. The results of the different participants are compared against the experimental data. Sensitivity studies were conducted by FZK using GASFLOW and by DNV applying KFX.<br/>Conclusions based on the comparisons and the sensitivity studies related to the performance of the applied turbulence models and discretisation schemes in the release and diffusion phase are proposed. These are compared to the findings of the previous benchmark exercises.