United States

This paper provides an introduction to the powered industrial truck application of fuel cell power systems the safety similarities with the automotive application and safety lessons learned. Fuel Cell niche markets have proven their value to many early adopters. How has the automotive market provided a springboard for these niche applications? How are niche markets revealing gaps in current safety approaches? What is different about the powered industrial truck application and what new codes and standards are needed to accommodate those differences?

There are times in engineering when it seems that safety and equipment cost reduction are conflicting priorities. This could be the case for pressure relief valves and vent stack sizing. This paper explores the role that component availability (particularly variety in flow and orifice diameters) plays in the engineer’s decision of a relief valve. This paper outlines the guidelines and assumptions in sizing and selecting pressure relief devices (PRDs) found in a typical high pressure hydrogen fueling station. It also provides steps in sizing the station common vent stack where the discharge gas is to be routed to prior being released into the atmosphere. This paper also explores the component availability landscape for hydrogen station designers and identifies opportunities for improvement in the supply chain of components as hydrogen fueling stations increase in number and size. American Society of Mechanical Engineers Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code Section VIII (ASME BPVC Section VIII) Compressed Gas Association S-1.3 (CGA S-1.3) and American Petroleum Institute 520 (API 520) standards provide specific design criteria for hydrogen pressure relief valves. Results of these calculations do not match the available components. The available safety relief valves are 50 to 87 times larger than the required calculated flow capacities. Selecting a significantly oversized safety relief valve affects the vent stack design as the stack design requires sizing relative to the actual flowrate of the safety relief valve. The effect on the vent stack size in turn negatively affects site safety radiation threshold set back distances.

Experiments are described in which hydrogen was released at the center of the floor of a real-scale enclosure having dimensions of a typical two-car residential garage. Real-time hydrogen concentrations were monitored at a number of locations. The hydrogen/air mixtures were ignited at pre-determined local volume fractions ranging from 8% to 29%. The combustion behavior and structural effects were monitored using combinations of high-speed pressure transducers and ionization gauges standard thermocouples hydrogen sensors and digital infrared and high-speed video cameras. Experiments were performed both for empty garages and garages with conventional automobiles parked above the hydrogen release location.

Various studies and market trends show that the number of hydrogen fuelling stations will increase to the thousands in the US by 2050. NFPA 2 Hydrogen Technologies Code (NFPA2) the nationally adopted primary code governing hydrogen safety is relatively new and hydrogen vehicle technology is a relatively new and rapidly developing technology. In order to effectively aid and accelerate the deployment of standardized retail hydrogen fuelling facilities the permitting of hydrogen fuelling stations employing outdoor bulk liquid storage in the state of California.

In an effort to better understand how the applicants consultants and more importantly the Authorities Having Jurisdiction (AHJ)s are interpreting and applying the NFPA 2 especially for complex applications the newest hydrogen stations with the largest amount of bulk hydrogen storage in urban environment settings were identified and the permit applications and permit approval outcomes of the said stations were analysed. Utilizing the pubic record request process LH2 station permit applications were reviewed along with the approval outcomes directly from the municipalities that issued the permits. AHJs with H2 station permitting experience were interviewed. Case studies of permit hydrogen fuelling station permit applications were then complied to document both the perspectives of the applicant and the AHJ and the often iterative and collaborative nature of permitting.

The current permitting time for Liquid Hydrogen (LH2) stations can range from 9 to 18 months in the California. Five out of the six LH2 stations applications required Alternative Means & Methods (AM&Ms) proposals and deviations from the prescriptive requirements of the Code were granted. Furthermore AHJs often requested additional documents and studies specific to application parameters in addition to NFPA 2 requirements.

The Hydrogen Incident Reporting and Lessons Learned website (www.h2incidents.org) was launched in 2006 as a database-driven resource for sharing lessons learned from hydrogen-related safety events to raise safety awareness and encourage knowledge-sharing. The development of this database its first uses and subsequent enhancements have been described at the Second and Third International Conferences on Hydrogen Safety [1] [2]. Since 2009 continuing work has not only highlighted the value of safety lessons learned but enhanced how the database provides access to another safety knowledge tool Hydrogen Safety Best Practices (http://h2bestpractices.org). Collaborations with the International Energy Agency (IEA) Hydrogen Implementing Agreement (HIA) Task 19 – Hydrogen Safety and others have enabled the database to capture safety event learning’s from around the world. This paper updates recent progress highlights the new “Lessons Learned Corner” as one means for knowledge-sharing and examines the broader potential for collecting analyzing and using safety event information.

In conjunction with John Zink Co. LLC the Chevron Energy Technology Company conducted a three part study evaluating potential issues with switching refinery process heaters from fuel gas to hydrogen fuel for the purpose of greenhouse gas emissions reduction via CO2 capture and storage.

The focus was on the following areas:

• Heater performance
• Burner performance and robustness
• Fuel gas system retrofit requirements

This paper will summarize the findings of the study.

Liquid hydrogen is increasingly being used as a delivery and storage medium for stations that provide compressed gaseous hydrogen for fuel cell electric vehicles. In efforts to provide scientific justification for separation distances for liquid hydrogen infrastructure in fire codes the dispersion characteristics of cryogenic hydrogen jets (50–64 K) from high aspect ratio nozzles have been measured at 3 and 5 barabs stagnation pressures. These nozzles are more characteristic of unintended leaks which would be expected to be cracks rather than conventional round nozzles. Spontaneous Raman scattering was used to measure the concentration and temperature field along the major and minor axes. Within the field of interrogation the axis-switching phenomena was not observed but rather a self-similar Gaussian-profile flow regime similar to room temperature or cryogenic hydrogen releases through round nozzles. The concentration decay rate and half-widths for the planar cryogenic jets were found to be nominally equivalent to that of round nozzle cryogenic hydrogen jets indicating a similar flammable envelope. The results from these experiments will be used to validate models for cryogenic hydrogen dispersion that will be used for simulations of alternative scenarios and quantitative risk assessment

"This paper summarises the modelling and experimental programme in the EC FP6 project HYPER. A number of key results are presented and the relevance of these findings to installation permitting guidelines (IPG) for small stationary hydrogen and fuel cell systems is discussed. A key aim of the activities was to generate new scientific data and knowledge in the field of hydrogen safety and where possible use this data as a basis to support the recommendations in the IPG. The structure of the paper mirrors that of the work programme within HYPER in that the work is described in terms of a number of relevant scenarios as follows: 1. high pressure releases 2. small foreseeable releases 3. catastrophic releases and 4. the effects of walls and barriers. Within each scenario the key objectives activities and results are discussed.<br/>The work on high pressure releases sought to provide information for informing safety distances for high-pressure components and associated fuel storage activities on both ignited and unignited jets are reported. A study on small foreseeable releases which could potentially be controlled through forced or natural ventilation is described. The aim of the study was to determine the ventilation requirements in enclosures containing fuel cells such that in the event of a foreseeable leak the concentration of hydrogen in air for zone 2 ATEX is not exceeded. The hazard potential of a possibly catastrophic hydrogen leakage inside a fuel cell cabinet was investigated using a generic fuel cell enclosure model. The rupture of the hydrogen feed line inside the enclosure was considered and both dispersion and combustion of the resulting hydrogen air mixture were examined for a range of leak rates and blockage ratios. Key findings of this study are presented. Finally the scenario on walls and barriers is discussed; a mitigation strategy to potentially reduce the exposure to jet flames is to incorporate barriers around hydrogen storage equipment. Conclusions of experimental and modelling work which aim to provide guidance on configuration and placement of these walls to minimise overall hazards is presented. "

For large-scale distribution and use of energy carriers classified as hazardous material in many countries as a method to assist land use planning to grant licenses to design a safe installation and to operate it safely some form of risk analysis and assessment is applied. Despite many years of experience the methods have still their weaknesses even the most elaborated ones as e.g. shown by the large spread in results when different teams perform an analysis on a same plant as was done in EU projects. Because a fuel as hydrogen with its different properties will come new in the daily use of many people incidents may happen and risks will be discussed. HySafe and other groups take good preparatory action in this respect and work in the right direction as appears from various documents produced. However already a superficial examination of the results so far tells that further cooperative work is indispensable. To avoid criticism skepticism and frustration not only the positive findings should be described and general features of the methods but the community has also to give strong guidance with regard to the uncertainties. Scenario development appears to be very dependent on insight and experience of an individual analyst leak and ignition probability may vary over a wide range of values Computational Fluid Dynamics or CFD models may lead to very different result. The Standard Benchmark Exercise Problems SBEPs are a good start but shall produce guidelines or recommendations for CFD use or even perhaps certification of models. Where feasible narrowing of possible details of scenarios to the more probable ones taking into account historical incident data and schematizing in bowties more explicit use of confidence intervals on e.g. failure rates and ignition probability estimates will help. Further knowledge gaps should be defined.

Contrary to several reports in the recent literature the use of oxygen sensors for indirectly monitoring ambient hydrogen concentration has serious drawbacks. This method is based on the assumption that a hydrogen release will displace oxygen which is quantified using oxygen sensors. Despite its shortcomings the draft Hydrogen Vehicle Global Technical Regulation lists this method as a means to monitor hydrogen leaks to verify vehicle fuel system integrity. Experimental evaluations that were designed to impartially compare the ability of commercial oxygen and hydrogen sensors to reliably measure and report hydrogen concentration changes are presented. Numerous drawbacks are identified and discussed.