Safety

The use of hydrogen as an energy carrier is going to widen exponentially in the next years. In order to ensure the public acceptance of the new fuel not only the environmental impact has to be excellent but also the risk management of its handling and storage must be improved. As a part of modern risk assessment procedure CFD modeling of the accident scenario development must provide reliable data on the possible pressure loads resulted from explosion processes. The expected combustion regimes can be ranged from slow flames to deflagration-to-detonation transition and even to detonation. In the last case the importance of the reliability of simulation results is particularly high since detonation is usually considered as a worst case state of affairs. A set of large-scale detonation experiments performed in Kurchatov Institute at RUT facility was selected as benchmark. RUT has typical industry-relevant characteristic dimensions. The CFD codes possibilities to correctly describe detonation in mixtures with different initial and boundary conditions were surveyed. For the modeling two detonation tests HYD05 and HYD09 were chosen; both tests were carried out in uniform hydrogen/air mixtures; first one with concentration of 20.0% vol. and the second one with 25.5% vol. In the present exercise three CFD codes using a number of different models were used to simulate these experiments. A thorough inter-comparison between the CFD results including codes models and obtained pressure predictions was carried out and reported. The results of this inter comparison should provide a solid basis for the further code development and detonation models’ validation thus improving CFD predictive capabilities.

Hydrogen is widely recognized as an attractive energy carrier due to its low-level air pollution and its high mass-related energy density. However its wide flammability range and high burning velocity present a potentially significant hazard. A significant fraction of hydrogen is stored and transported as a cryogenic liquid. Therefore loss of hydrogen containments may lead to the formation of a pool on the ground. In general very large spills will give a pool whereas moderate sized spills may evaporate immediately. Accurate hazard assessments of storage systems require a proper prediction of the liquid hydrogen pool evaporation and spreading. A new pool model handling the spread and the evaporation of liquid spills on different surfaces has recently been developed in the 3D Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) tool FLACS [1-4]. As the influence of geometry on the liquid spread is taken into account in the new pool model realistic industrial scenarios can be investigated. The model has been validated for LNG spills on water with the Burro and Coyote experiments [56]. The model has previously been tested for LH2 release in the framework of the EU-sponsored Network of Excellence HySafe where experiments carried out by BAM were modelled. In the large scale BAM experiments [7] 280 kg of liquid hydrogen was spilled in 6 tests adjacent to buildings. In these tests the pool spreading the evaporation and the cloud formation were investigated. Simulations of these tests are found to compare reasonably well with the experimental results. In the present work the model is extended and the liquid hydrogen spill experiments carried out by NASA are simulated with the new pool model. The large scale NASA experiments [89] consisted of 7 releases of liquefied hydrogen at White Sand New Mexico. The release test 6 is used. During these experiments cloud concentrations were measured at several distances downwind of the spill point. With the new pool model feature the FLACS tool is shown to be an efficient and accurate tool for the investigation of complex and realistic accidental release scenarios of cryogenic liquids.

The objectives of the presented experimental work were investigation of hydrogen release distribution and combustion modelling possible emergency situation at industry scale. Results of large scale experiments on distribution and combustion in an open and congested area are presented. The mass of hydrogen in experiments varied from 50g to 1000g with release rate from 180 to 220 g/s. Qualitative characteristics of high momentum hydrogen jet releases distribution and subsequent combustion were obtained. It is shown that obstacles slow down jet speed promote combustible mixture formation in a large volume and accelerate combustion process. The maximum overpressure in experiments with additional congested area reached ΔР = 0.4 atm. Using partial confinement of congested area turbulent combustion regime with the maximum overpressure more than 10 atm. was obtained.

As a part of the experimental work of the EC-funded project HYPER Pro-Science GmbH performed experiments to evaluate the hazard potential of a severe hydrogen leakage inside a fuel cell cabinet. During this study hydrogen distribution and combustion experiments were performed using a generic enclosure model with the dimensions of the fuel cell "Penta H2" provided by ARCOTRONICS (now EXERGY Fuel Cells) to the project partner UNIPI for their experiments on small foreseeable leaks. Hydrogen amounts of 1.5 to 15 g H2 were released within one second into the enclosure through a nozzle with an internal diameter of 8 mm. In the distribution experiments the effects of different venting characteristics and different amounts of internal enclosure obstruction on the hydrogen concentrations measured at fixed positions in- and outside the model were investigated. Based on the results of these experiments combustion experiments with ignition positions in- and outside the enclosure and two different ignition times were performed. BOS (Background-Oriented-Schlieren) observation combined with pressure and light emission measurements were performed to describe the characteristics and the hazard potential of the induced hydrogen combustions. The experiments provide new experimental data on the distribution and combustion behaviour of hydrogen that is released into a partly vented and partly obstructed enclosure with different venting characteristics.

In many areas European research has been largely fragmented. To support the required integration and to focus and coordinate related research efforts the European Commission created a new instrument the Networks of Excellences (NoEs). The goal of the NoE HySafe has been to provide the basis to facilitate the safe introduction of hydrogen as an energy carrier by removing the safety related obstacles. The prioritisation of the HySafe internal project activities was based on a phenomena identification and ranking exercise (PIRT) and expert interviews. The identified research headlines were “Releases in (partially) confined areas” “Mitigation” and “Quantitative Risk Assessment”. Along these headlines existing or planned research work was re-orientated and slightly modified to build up three large internal research projects “InsHyde” “HyTunnel” and “HyQRA”. In InsHyde realistic indoor hydrogen leaks and associated hazards have been investigated to provide recommendations for the safe use of indoor hydrogen systems including mitigation and detection means. The appropriateness of available regulations codes and standards (RCS) has been assessed. Experimental and numerical work was conducted to benchmark simulation tools and to evaluate the related recommendations. HyTunnel contributed to the understanding of the nature of the hazards posed by hydrogen vehicles inside tunnels and its relative severity compared to other fuels. In HyQRA quantitative risk assessment strategies were applied to relevant scenarios in a hydrogen refuelling station and the performance was compared to derive also recommendations. The integration provided by the network is manifested by a series of workshops and benchmarks related to experimental and numerical work. Besides the network generated the following products: the International Conference on Hydrogen Safety the first academic education related to hydrogen safety and the Safety Handbook. Finally the network initiated the founding of the International Association for Hydrogen Safety which will open up the future networking to all interested parties on an international level. The indicated results of this five years integration activity will be described in short.

For hydrogen fuelled vehicles to attain significant market penetration it is essential that any potential risks be controlled within acceptable levels. To achieve this goal on-board vehicle hydrogen storage systems should undergo risk analyses during early concept development and design phases. By so doing the process of eliminating safety-critical failure modes will help guide storage system development and be more efficient to implement than if undertaken after the design-freeze stage. The focus of this paper is the development of quantitative risk analyses of storage systems which use onboard reversible materials such as conventional AB5 metal hydrides the complex hydride NaAlH4 or other material candidates currently being researched. Collision of a vehicle having such a hydrogen storage system was selected as a dominant accident initiator and a probabilistic event tree model has been developed for this initiator. The event tree model contains a set of comprehensive mutually exclusive accident sequences. The event tree represents chronological ordering of key events that are postulated to occur sequentially in time during the accident progression. Each event may represent occurrence of a phenomenon (e.g. hydride chemical reaction and dust cloud explosion) or a hardware failure (e.g. hydride storage vessel rupture). Event tree branch probabilities can be quantified using fault tree models or basic events with probability distributions. A fault tree model for hydride dust cloud explosion is provided as an example. Failure probabilities assigned to the basic events in the fault tree can be estimated from test results published data or expert opinion elicitation. To account for variabilities in the probabilities assigned to fault tree basic events and hence to propagate uncertainties in event tree sequences Monte Carlo sampling and Latin Hypercube sampling were employed and the statistics of the results from both techniques were compared.

A possible consequence of pressurized hydrogen release is an under-expanded jet fire. Knowledge of the flame length radiative heat flux and fraction as well as the effects of variations in ground reflectance is important for safety assessment. The present study applies an open source CFD code FireFOAM to study the radiation characteristics of hydrogen and hydrogen/methane jet fires. For combustion the eddy dissipation concept for multi-component fuels recently developed by the authors in the large eddy simulation (LES) framework is used. The radiative heat is computed with the finite volume discrete ordinates model in conjunction with the weighted-sum-of-gray-gases model for the absorption/emission coefficient. The pseudo-diameter approach is used in which the corresponding parameters are calculated using the correlations of Birch et al. [22]. The predicted flame length and radiant fraction are in good agreement with the measurements of Schefer et al. [2] Studer et al. [3] and Ekoto et al. [6]. In order to account for the effects of variation in ground surface reflectance the emissivity of hydrogen flames was modified following Ekoto et al. [6]. Four cases with different ground reflectance are computed. The predictions show that the ground surface reflectance only has minor effect on the surface emissive power of the hydrogen jet fire. The radiant fractions fluctuate from 0.168 to 0.176 close to the suggested value of 0.16 by Ekoto et al.[6] based on the analysis of their measurements.

One of the main benefits sought by including hydrogen in the alternative fuels mix is emissions reduction – eventually by 100%. However in the near term there is a very significant cost differential between fossil fuels and hydrogen. Hythane (a blend of hydrogen and natural gas) can act as a viable next step on the path to an ultimate hydrogen economy as a fuel blend consisting of 8−30 % hydrogen in methane can reduce emissions while not requiring significant changes in existing infrastructure. This work seeks to evaluate whether hythane may be safer than both hydrogen and methane under certain conditions. This is due to the fact hythane combines the positive safety properties of hydrogen (strong buoyancy high diffusivity) and methane (much lower flame speeds and narrower flammability limits as compared to hydrogen). For this purpose several different mixture compositions (e.g. 8 % 20 % and 30 % hydrogen) are considered. The evaluation of (a) dispersion characteristics (which are more positive than for methane) (b) combustion characteristics (which are closer to methane than hydrogen) and (c) Combined dispersion + explosion risk is performed. This risk is expected to be comparable to that of pure methane possibly lower in some situations and definitely lower than for pure hydrogen. The work is performed using the CFD software FLACS that has been well-validated for safety studies of both natural gas/methane and hydrogen systems. The first part of the work will involve validating the flame speeds and flammability limits predicted by FLACS against values available in literature. The next part of the work involves validating the overpressures predicted by the CFD tool for combustion of premixed mixtures of methane and hydrogen with air against available experimental data. In the end practical systems such as vehicular tunnels garages etc. is used to demonstrate positive safety benefits of hythane with comparisons to similar simulations for both hydrogen and methane.

The United Nations Economic Commission for Europe Global Technical Regulation (GTR) Number 13 (Global Technical Regulation on Hydrogen and Fuel Cell Vehicles) is the defining document regulating safety requirements in hydrogen vehicles and in particular fuel cell electric vehicles (FCEVs). GTR Number 13 has been formally adopted and will serve as the basis for the national regulatory standards for FCEV safety in North America (led by the United States) Japan Korea and the European Union. The GTR defines safety requirements for these vehicles including specifications on the allowable hydrogen levels in vehicle enclosures during in-use and post-crash conditions and on the allowable hydrogen emissions levels in vehicle exhaust during certain modes of normal operation. However in order to be incorporated into national regulations that is to be legally binding methods to verify compliance with the specific requirements must exist. In a collaborative program the Sensor Laboratories at the National Renewable Energy Laboratory in the United States and the Joint Research Centre Institute for Energy and Transport in the Netherlands have been evaluating and developing analytical methods that can be used to verify compliance with the hydrogen release requirements as specified in the GTR.

Experimental work on hydrogen releases consequences in a 31-m3 semi-confined enclosure was performed in the framework of the collaborative European Hyindoor project. Natural ventilation effectiveness on hydrogen build-up limitation in a confined area was studied for several configurations of ventilation openings and of release conditions in real environmental conditions [1]; influence of wind on gas build-up was observed as well. This paper proposes a critical analysis of these experiments carried out by HSL and compares results with analytical approaches available in open scientific literature. The validity of these models in presence of wind was broached.