Greece

In the present work CFD simulations of a large scale open deflagration experiment are performed. Stoichiometric hydrogen–air mixture occupies a 20 m hemisphere. Two combustion models are compared and evaluated against the experiment: the Eddy Dissipation Concept model and a multi-physics combustion model which calculates turbulent burning velocity based on Yakhot's equation. Sensitivity analysis on the value of fractal dimension of the latter model is performed. A semi-empirical relation which estimates the fractal dimension is also tested. The effect of the turbulence model on the results is examined. LES approach and k-ε models are used. The multi-physics combustion model with constant fractal dimension value equal to 2.3 using the RNG LES turbulence model achieves the best agreement with the experiment.

Correct use of Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) tools is essential in order to have confidence in the results. A comprehensive set of Best Practice Guidelines (BPG) in numerical simulations for Fuel Cells and Hydrogen applications has been one of the main outputs of the SUSANA project. These BPG focus on the practical needs of engineers in consultancies and industry undertaking CFD simulations or evaluating CFD simulation results in support of hazard/risk assessments of hydrogen facilities as well as on the needs of regulatory authorities. This contribution presents a summary of the BPG document. All crucial aspects of numerical simulations are addressed such as selection of the physical models domain design meshing boundary conditions and selection of numerical parameters. BPG cover all hydrogen safety relative phenomena i.e. release and dispersion ignition jet fire deflagration and detonation. A series of CFD benchmarking exercises are also presented serving as examples of appropriate modelling strategies.

A benchmarking exercise on quantitative risk assessment (QRA) methodologies has been conducted within the project HyQRA under the framework of the European Network of Excellence (NoE) HySafe. The aim of the exercise was basically twofold: (i) to identify the differences and similarities in approaches in a QRA and their results for a hydrogen installation between nine participating partners representing a broad spectrum of background in QRA culture and history and (ii) to identify knowledge gaps in the various steps and parameters underlying the risk quantification. In the first step a reference case was defined: a virtual hydrogen refuelling station (HRS) in virtual surroundings comprising housing school shops and other vulnerable objects. All partners were requested to conduct a QRA according to their usual approach and experience. Basically participants were free to define representative release cases to apply models and frequency assessments according their own methodology and to present risk according to their usual format. To enable inter-comparison a required set of results data was prescribed like distances to specific thermal radiation levels from fires and distances to specific overpressure levels. Moreover complete documentation of assumptions base data and references was to be reported. It was not surprising that a wide range of results was obtained both in the applied approaches as well as in the quantitative outcomes and conclusions. This made it difficult to identify exactly which assumptions and parameters were responsible for the differences in results as the paper will show. A second phase was defined in which the QRA was determined by a more limited number of release cases (scenarios). The partners in the project agreed to assess specific scenarios in order to identify the differences in consequence assessment approaches. The results of this phase provide a better understanding of the influence of modelling assumptions and limitations on the eventual conclusions with regard to risk to on-site people and to the off-site public. This paper presents the results and conclusions of both stages of the exercise.

We are addressing hydrogen release into a single-vented facility with wind blowing onto the opposite side of the vent wall. Earlier work based on tests performed by HSL with wind (within the HyIndoor project) and comparative CFD simulations with and without wind ([1]within the H2FC project) has shown that the hydrogen concentrations inside the enclosure are increased compared to the case with no wind. This was attributed to the fact that wind is disrupting the passive ventilation. The present work is based on the GAMELAN tests (within the HyIndoor project) performed with one vent and no wind. For this enclosure simulations were performed with and without wind and reproduced the disrupting wind effect. In order to remove this effect and enhance the ventilation additional simulations were performed by considering different geometrical modifications near the vent. A simple geometrical layout around the vent is here proposed that leads to elimination of the disrupting wind effect. The analysis has been performed using the ADREA-HF code earlier validated both for the HSL and the GAMELAN tests. The current work was performed partly within HyIndoor project

The “SUpport to SAfety aNAlysis of Hydrogen and Fuel Cell Technologies (SUSANA)” project aims to support stakeholders using Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) for safety engineering design and assessment of FCH systems and infrastructure through the development of a model evaluation protocol. The protocol covers all aspects of safety assessment modelling using CFD from release through dispersion to combustion (self-ignition fires deflagrations detonations and Deflagration to Detonation Transition - DDT) and not only aims to enable users to evaluate models but to inform them of the state of the art and best practices in numerical modelling. The paper gives an overview of the SUSANA project including the main stages of the model evaluation protocol and some results from the on-going benchmarking activities.

Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) has already proven to be a powerful tool to study the hydrogen dispersion and help in the hydrogen safety assessment. In this work the Large Eddy Simulation (LES) recently incorporated into the ADREA-HF CFD code is evaluated against the INERIS-6C experiment of hydrogen leakage in a supposed garage which provides detailed experimental measurements visualization of the flow and availability of previous CFD results from various institutions (HySafe SBEP-V3). The short-term evolution of the hydrogen concentrations in this confined space is examined and comparison with experimental data is provided along with comments about the ability of LES to capture the transient phenomena occurring during hydrogen dispersion. The influence of the value of the Smagorinsky constant on the resolved and on the unresolved turbulence is also presented. Furthermore the renormalization group (RNG) LES methodology is also tested and its behaviour in both highly-turbulent and less-turbulent parts of the flow is highlighted.

In the present work the capabilities of the computational fluid dynamics (CFD) code ADREA-HF to predict deflagration in homogenous near stoichiometric hydrogen-air mixture in a model of a tunnel were tested. The tunnel is 78.5 m long. Hydrogen-air mixture is located in a 10 m long region in the middle of the tunnel. Two cases are studied: one with a complete empty tunnel and one with the presence of four vehicles near the center of the tunnel. The combustion model is based on the turbulent flame speed concept. The turbulent flame speed is a modification of Yakhot's equation in order to account for additional physical mechanisms. A sensitivity analysis for the  parameter of the combustion model and for the mesh resolution was made for the empty tunnel case. The agreement between experimental and computational results concerning the value of the maximum pressure and the time it appears is satisfactory in both cases. The sensitivity analysis for the parameter of the combustion model showed that even small changes in it can have impact on the simulating results whereas the sensitivity analysis of the mesh resolution did not reveal any significant differences.

Climate change and global warming pose great sustainability challenges to the aviation industry. Alternatives to petroleum-based fuels (hydrogen natural gas etc.) have emerged as promising aviation fuels for future aircraft. The present study aimed to contribute to the understanding of the impact of material selection on aviation sustainability accounting for the type of fuel implemented and circular economy aspects. In this context a decision support tool was introduced to aid decisionmakers and relevant stakeholders to identify and select the best-performing materials that meet their defined needs and preferences expressed through a finite set of conflicting criteria associated with ecological economic and circularity aspects. The proposed tool integrates life-cycle-based metrics extending to both ecological and economical dimensions and a proposed circular economy indicator (CEI) focused on the material/component level and linked to its quality characteristics which also accounts for the quality degradation of materials which have undergone one or more recycling loops. The tool is coupled with a multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) methodology in order to reduce subjectivity when determining the importance of each of the considered criteria.

The use of stationary H2 and fuel cell systems is expected to increase rapidly in the future. In order to facilitate the safe introduction of this new technology the HyPer project funded by the EC developed a public harmonized Installation Permitting Guidance (IPG) document for the installation of small stationary H2 and fuel cell systems for use in various environments. The present contribution focuses on the safety assessment of a facility inside which a small H2 fuel cell system (4.8 kWe) is installed and operated. Dispersion experiments were designed and performed by partner UNIPI. The scenarios considered cover releases occurring inside the fuel cell at the valve of the inlet gas pipeline just before the pressure regulator which controls the H2 flow to the fuel cell system. H2 was expected to leak out of the fuel cell into the facility and then outdoors through the ventilation system. The initial leakage diameter was chosen based on the Italian technical guidelines for the enforcement of the ATEX European directive. Several natural ventilation configurations were examined. The performed tests were simulated by NCSRD using the ADREA-HF code. The numerical analysis took into account the full interior of the fuel cell in order to investigate for any potential accumulation effects. Comparisons between predicted and experimental H2 concentrations at 4 sensor locations inside the facility are reported. Finally an overall assessment of the ventilation efficiency was made based on the simulations and experiments.

In the present work a newly developed CFD deflagration model incorporated into the ADREA-HF code is evaluated against hydrogen vented deflagrations experiments carried out by KIT and FM-Global in a medium (1 m3) and a real (63.7 m3) scale enclosure respectively. A square vent of 0.5 m2 and 5.4 m2 respectively is located in the center of one of side walls. In the case of the medium scale enclosure the 18% v/v homogeneous hydrogen-air mixture and back-wall ignition case is examined. In the case of the real scale enclosure the examined cases cover different homogeneous mixture concentrations (15% and 18% v/v) different ignition locations (back-wall and center) and different levels of initial turbulence. The CFD model accounts for flame instabilities that develop as the flame propagates inside the chamber and turbulence that mainly develops outside the vent. Pressure predictions are compared against experimental measurements revealing a very good performance of the CFD model for the back-wall ignition cases. For the center ignition cases the model overestimates the maximum overpressure. The opening of the vent cover is identified as a possible reason for the overprediction. The analysis indicates that turbulence is the main factor which enhances external explosion strength causing the sudden pressure increase confirming previous findings.